Page 43 - Lot Code News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Code, and the existing interpretation for that section. And again, to meet that, the new structure in the rear could not be more than three feet above the existing natural grade which this project does not and it could not be in the last 15 feet of the rear of the property which this is well far from. And again, this specific text of the code, does state that this is to be provided for the garages. And but it is for the slope lots and in the rear yard, and this the Zoning Administrator has consistently interpreted that this provision can apply for structures other than garages because he looke...

Those roots will be done in a manner that will be acceptable to the arborist and we will be happy to engage the appellants arborist. And in regard to the additional excavation, and and the Water Proofing will be the top on the addendum but the package that will be reviewed to the dbi. Thank you. How do you handle the drainage that is exterior to the structure . We have the permit water system and a membrane and it will have a series of drains, below the slab that will be connected to a sump pump and it will be a permanent watering system and we will make sure that the walls are designed for th...

Uninhabitable and we feel to use that without the Public Notice and without the public review, is questionable. In stream lining we review this approval as part of an ongoing effort to put more projects outsides of the purview of the public review. And the decision is fundamentally at odds with the traditions of the development in San Francisco, and with the stated intent of the planning code which is to create the openness, transparency, and to foster harmony the construction along the Property Line and this is standard and encouraged by the Design Guidelines that the new rear yard additions ...

Good evening, commissioners, cory tea gue, this is a rear addition to the existing building that is primarily below grade and it was approved by our department on october 8th of this year and it did not require 311 notification, because it did fall under a permitted rear yard structure under 136 c26 as mentioned the project sponsor did work cooperatively and proactively with the Planning Department early on to make sure that the design would meet the planning code, and the existing interpretation for that section. And again, to meet that, the new structure in the rear could not be more than th...

Permitted rear yard structure under 136 c26 as mentioned the project sponsor did work cooperatively and proactively with the Planning Department early on to make sure that the design would meet the planning code, and the existing interpretation for that section. And again, to meet that, the new structure in the rear could not be more than three feet above the existing natural grade which this project does not and it could not be in the last 15 feet of the rear of the property which this is well far from. And again, this specific text of the code, does state that this is to be provided for the ...