Buyers said that they could not take possession of their flats because contrary to what the developer had told the apex court, many flats were not ready for possession as they did not have an OC, which is mandatory prior to handing over possession.
The Authority said the completion certificate, obtained by the Mantri Group before RERA was enacted, did not contain the name of the project. Additionally, it said the project clearances were obtained after the enactment of RERA.
Supreme Court IBC | Section 9 Petition Not To Be Dismissed If Few Invoices Are Time Barred But Remaining Invoices Are Not; Supreme Court Case Title: M/S Next Education India Pvt. Ltd. v M/S.
NCLAT Threshold Limit Of Rs. 1 Crore Applicable From The Date Of Filing And Not From Date Of Registration Of Petition: NCLAT Delhi Case Title: Royal Manpower Services v Faridabad Autocomp.