the credibility of the prosecution s case. sometimes that gets uncomfortable. this is what aimee wrote the day after she said shane confessed to her to murder. april the 30th, the very next day. you make a statement, made love an afternoon. great day. for the sake of decency, we left out the most explicit centrists and trees made public by the defense that. and then, may the 3rd was the date that you recorded you took a bath together and we love. yes. but then it was on may the 7th, you noted, great love, decided i would move in with him in july. perfect. yes. so, this man who had told you that he had killed you made the decision that you were going to move in with him
we have, for the sake of decency, left out the most explicit entries made public by the defense that day. and then may the 3rd was the date that you recorded you took a bath together and made love. right? yes. and then it was on may the 7th you notated you noted, great love. decided i would move in with him in july. perfect. yes. so this man who had told you that he had killed someone, you made the decision that you were going to move in with him come july? yes. so was her credibility harmed? there was still, after all, that incriminating airport recording. or was it incriminating? you never did ask him, though, if he had shot and killed trent, did you? why would i when he had already told me? and if i said to him, did you
reporter: this is what aimee wrote the day after she said shane confessed to her to murder. april the 30th, the very next day, you make a notation, made love in afternoon. great day. reporter: we have, for the sake of decency, left out the most explicit entries made public by the defense that day. and then may the 3rd was the date that you recorded you took a bath together and made love. right? yes. and then it was on may the 7th you notated you noted, great love. decided i would move in with him in july. perfect. yes. so this man who had told you that he had killed someone, you made the decision that you were going to move in with him come july? yes. reporter: so was her credibility harmed?
credible source of information. it s what agents are trained to do. it s even what lawyers are trained to do. we write down exactly what happened and when it happened, and it will speak for itself. i agree, though that there are a lot of questions about comey, and i think that that s why we need the public hearing, so that the american people can evaluate exactly what happened. what did the president say? what did james comey do? i think those are important questions, and hopefully, next week we ll get the answers to them. yeah. scott, go ahead. what was your question? yeah, i was just going to ask, i mean, if what s in this memo is said is true if what is in there is true, then why didn t he tell somebody? how is it that the deputy director of the fbi didn t know about it when he testified on may 11th? how is it that comey didn t bring it up himself when he testified on may the 3rd? the timeline of this is what has a lot of republicans questioning credibility. i m not disputin
investigation. you have to have a full investigation. the president can t investigate himself. the white house can t be in charge of that investigation. hugh hewitt, you re a lawyer in addition to your radio show and political commentaries. do you agree that stuff is starting to stack up, first of all? does the president need a lawyer? well, he has a lawyer, chris, in the white house. it is an explosive story in the new york times. if the memo exists, and i believe it probably does, we need to see it. i had senator ben sasse on my radio show this morning, chairman of the judiciary committee. he spent all day yesterday in an information facility, trying to organize the request not just for that memo but all comey memos. he concurred it would have been appropriate for the former director at the testimony that he gave on may the 3rd before the judiciary committee to have alerted the committee if he felt