in tonight with its opposition to gop calls for stronger work requirements to be included in o anpposity budget agreement thatd be paired with a debt ceilingde increasebt cei. the issu now, the issue of a work requirement has actually emerged as one of the biggest remaining hurdles for reaching an agreement between negotiators for the white house and houseite ho republicans. rhere is a top gop negotiatous who s weighing in on thisighi tonight. that s louisiana congressman garret graveng in on thi s loui he said tonight his party will not drop their demand for tougher work requirements as part of a final agreement. now, democrats have converselypi argued that, listen, social benefit programs already have s as work requirements in place,n plc adding that to them. this is ale.l an necessary. meanwhile, as you pointed out, the president and his top advisers were over at camp david this weekend working perhap s as is june 5th. deadline quickly approaches. jason , we re all going t
realize that gay people caolnutl n a lot of different industries or where we re from whersus different background and have, you know, love lives. and we have families and we have dreams for our future. it was really about being left alone, but being treated equally and fairly. ba tremendous treme progress. nd pr as thoughog there has to be another step forward,p another kind of push for something for everyone to be a victim or for for some kindomi of new dynamic that indicatengsa well, almost liktee an addictony that once you have, you reach kindou have a center point to , you kind of have to go further . and those kinds of ads really, i i think, do damage to the and community, to the community s minority communities, to the transgender community, because it s it s pandering. . it s it s extreme. and it doesn t it s not does not respect the audience in a sense.
and these, quote unquote, mistakes, they always happen against conservatives. it never goes the other way. i m not i m not aware of a single case where it goes the other way. but this suppression,as hap , how doression, you fight back against that? so i think one thing from a policy perspective is that we need to roll back section 230 c two , or else we have to say that we make it an opt in statute. i have no interest in suing linkedin over this. but let s say this is happening to somebody who couldn t get this reversed. as quickly as i did. and they did want to sue linkedin over it under a state law, they wouldn t be able to because linkedin enjoys a special form of immunity for internet companies, internet platforms that says they can t be sued even under state nondiscrimination laws. my view is if the federal government gives you a specialin form of immunityternet and protg ,then they oughtiv to bees bound by the same standards as the federal government itself.otectn that includ
there were hard facts aboutwereh climate change policy, hard facts abouart biden s relationships with china. and then i get locked out of my account so people start i gel to text me saying i cant. access your stuff. so we sent apen emaiople sl thik was a technical glitch. they came back and said it i contained misleading oritch. inaccurate information. so my team asked them, well,amek what information was inaccurate? they came back and doubled down and said this violated their policy on hate speech,ts misinformation and violence. violate now, when we actuall, to then publicize that, i made w that publiile that ic, they stad to get media inquiries. linkedin theicn backed off and said, oh, no, this is just an error on their part. this is not an error. this is viewpoint based censorship. and if it can happen to me, it s happening everyday americans across this country to a platform where people use it to find jobs. so what they re saying is you can t find a job unless you actually spe
i don t know what the proper charges, but that guy is moments away from losing his life. if she just extensor her tricepo and puts that that machetesi through his neck, yeah. and yet we ve had people sitting in jail for years for the audacity of showing up on the capitol steps on january six . i agree with leo, of course,thii this is all politically motivated, but it doesn t just put the citizens in danger, right. with the system of lawer wit enforcement not workinh g. it also serves to discouragees a population when we feedil like depean t depend on our justice system, the electoral systemalrd is already under suspicion. that s createdy a lot of unease among americans . and now we can t even really depend on our justice system to do what it was designed to do. it s very demoralizing, but that s what demn utopia is . ve it s a society without consequences. to them, it s utopia. in reality, it s . reali