Stay updated with breaking news from Mech head. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
were not going to issue that statement that rudy giuliani wanted to include burisma in the 2016 elections, there was no white house meeting. soon became clear to them that the security assistance was also at risk and that took on a renewed importance for them. following the july 25th call, it had to include that they would do the investigations of burisma which equaled the biden investigation into the ukraine interference. was their concern about doing the investigations or what? where they supposed to make a statement about it? ambassador sondland very clearly testified that all he ever heard mr. giuliani or anyone say is that they only needed the public announcement of the investigation. without that public statement that there would be no white house meeting. yes. i was struck by how clear the evidence seems to be on this point and i d like to play another example. was they were a quid pro quo? as i testified previously with regard to the requested white hou ....
National security to make sure that democracy remains worldwide. had prior to that call, congress had approved the aide, correct? congress had approved the aide and the withheld the aide. a mech head and even publicly announced its intention to deliver the aide, correct? the trump administration had already certified that they had taken substantial steps to combat corruption, correct? that normally leads to the release of aide. in the investigative committees question witnesses from the defense department, state department, omb, white house and national security council about the president s decision to withhold aid, correct? i would like to play a clip of some of that evidence. from what you witnessed, did anybody in the national security community support withholding the assistance? no. i never heard anyone advocate for holding the aide. the entire agency support of ....