Page 2 - Methane Rules News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

By 2030, a $369 billion commitment to clean energy initiatives in the "inflation reduction act" as well as new methane rules. how was this all received by the crowd there and by experts? >> i think the sentiment is wow, it's such a great change, given the predecessor, given the tone in the trump administration. but i think the consensus is, america's ambitions don't go nearly far enough to meet the problem. just in terms of meeting his goals by 2030, he says the u.s. is on track for that. the more important goal is the idea that we pay this cut to the year the u.s. started moving off coal, 200...

>> we have methane rules in place. we are going further. we have new clear auto standards. the difference today is that those auto manufacturers that were fighting us are now supporting us for those standards. because they know the future is electric. they see the bipartisan infrastructure law as a way of building up those charging stations. they are driving 700 million more into the effort to continue to build the infrastructure we need for clean energy. i'm not worried about their ability to regulate more under this particular statute in terms of greenhouse gas emissions. you have to worry a...

Net zero emissions by 2070, that's two decades later than what they say it needs to happen. china essentially has done -- it's a little closer. it says it will reach net zero by 2060. but people here say that's not enough. you need to get china, which is now the world's largest producer of greenhouse gases in line much quicker than 2060. >> one curiosity i'll have is will american oil companies practice what they -- practice the regulated standards overseas that they're forced to practice in the united states? have we gotten any pledge like that? >> i have not heard of that. one of the things ...

Them better for the environment. and one other thing wasn't noted is natural gas of course is a transitional fuel right now. and one of the things among many that the trump administration has done that is so bad for our environment that i would reverse is their changes to the methane rules and methane emission that's very dangerous. >> you and scientisting have aid said. -- they talked about the urgency with which people need to act. they said we need to end the fossil fuel era as soon as possible or we'll have the effects that can't be reversed >> up number. >> in a recent interview you said ...

Holding out the presidents had come i mean these people are sick in the head. this prime minister, this is disgusting but it comes in a long line and a long pattern of leftist saying things like i want to blow up the white house which is what ashley judd said so it's a consistent pattern here. >> jason: her justification, i mean, she didn't pull it down right away be a part of her justification was that president trump is not doing enough or climate change and when he change the methane rules now she wants people to be killed and destroyed and property and destruction on the united states of a...