Page 48 - Mind Reader News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

You don't require a mind reader. in every criminal case and i would assume in every impeachment case, yes, you have to show that the president was operating from a corrupt motive, and we have, but he also makes an argument that all quid pro quos are the same and all are perfectly copacetic. some of you said earlier if they could prove a quid pro quo over the military, that would be something. well, we have, so now the argument shifts to all quid pro quos are just fine. they're all the same. i'm going to apply professor dershowitz's own test. he talked about the step test, john ralls the philos...

Next election from any foreign power. and the argument will be made, nope, donald trump was acquitted for doing exactly the same thing. therefore it must not be impeachable. now, bear in mind, that efforts to cheat in an election are always going to be in proximity to an election, and if you say you can't hold a president accountable in an election year where they're trying to cheat in that election, then you are giving them carte blanche. so all quid pros are not the same. some are legitimate and some are corrupt, and you don't need to be a mind reader to figure out which is which. for one th...

Fact for what he says he believes is fact. the idea that the president gave up the aid by good will is false. he said he gave up the aid because he got caught. the gop response is look, congress was going to give the aid regardless. >> you know, chairman schiff should take this show on the road. he's a good mind reader, he ought to go in the circus. his practice here has made it easy for him to travel in the circus and reading people's mind. he thinks he's so good at it. the truth is, the evidence is not there. it's based on hearsay. the american people should be outraged at this railroad and ...

Congressman schiff, but you do find it concerning that a wince in realtime -- >> i think he doesn't like the president. >> you do find it concerning that a witness in realtime found the president's tweet to be, quote, intimidating? that is something that concerns you? >> it's certainly not impeachable and certainly not criminal and certainly not witness intimidation. it wasn't trying to prevent or or wood have prevented her from testifying. she was in the process of testifying. nonetheless, i find the president's tweets unfortunate. >> if a witness says she's intimidated, how is it not witness...

You find it concerning the witness in real time find the president's tweet to be, quote, intimidating. >> it's not impeachable, it's not intimidated. she was actually in the process of testifying. nonetheless -- it's unfortunate. >> if she's said she's intimidated how it was not witness intimidation? >> well, there's a difference between i feel intimidated. i'm intimidated to testify which is what schif wf was saying. she testified completely and fully. hopefully you watched it. i was there. she was in no means intimidated and prevented from testimony. >> just like you're not a mind reader. i ...