Page 13 - Movement Project News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

That would be difficult and disruptive to remove at a later date. This option would also complicate a future extension of the line and or station. And abandoning the tbms in the ground object columbus would require the sfmta to compensate the contractor for the loss of resale value to machines, removing the tbm trailing gear, and also could cause some potential schedule delays to the existing tunnel contract and station work. Option 4 is removing the tunnel blowing machines at 17 31 powell street, commonly known as pagoda palace. This would require additional study. The property is a former ci...

Real. Right. The downside of option 3 is that in order to accommodate for north beach station, you would the likelihood would be that you would have to remove these machines, which would be from a difficult operation in the future. Were currently looking at, though, to look at ways of perhaps diverting the machines, kind of off the path so that would either minimize or, you know, prevent the need to remove these machines. And normally when you use a tunnel Boring Machine at the end of the project, that tunnel Boring Machine comes out and it i guess goes onto another project somewhere to dig ag...

[speaker not understood]. It says it would be encased in concrete and it would be more difficult to continue the tunnel along if we were to continue to north beach or Fishermans Wharf in the future. Is that correct . I believe, director brinkman, youre referring to option 3. Yes. The benefits of option 3, it does allow the construction of 3,000 feet of critical thank youerctionv that could make the possibility of an extension be real. Right. The downside of option 3 is that in order to accommodate for north beach station, you would the likelihood would be that you would have to remove these ma...

Yes. The benefits of option 3, it does allow the construction of 3,000 feet of critical thank youerctionv that could make the possibility of an extension be real. Right. The downside of option 3 is that in order to accommodate for north beach station, you would the likelihood would be that you would have to remove these machines, which would be from a difficult operation in the future. Were currently looking at, though, to look at ways of perhaps diverting the machines, kind of off the path so that would either minimize or, you know, prevent the need to remove these machines. And normally when...

[speaker not understood]. It says it would be encased in concrete and it would be more difficult to continue the tunnel along if we were to continue to north beach or Fishermans Wharf in the future. Is that correct . I believe, director brinkman, youre referring to option 3. Yes. The benefits of option 3, it does allow the construction of 3,000 feet of critical thank youerctionv that could make the possibility of an extension be real. Right. The downside of option 3 is that in order to accommodate for north beach station, you would the likelihood would be that you would have to remove these ma...