Live Breaking News & Updates on National Interests And Foreign Policy Strategy

Introduction
One of the important characteristics of the current situation in the field of international relations (IR) in China is an ongoing discussion since late 1980s about the advisability of creating a China-specific IR theory. Proponents of Sinicization claim that contemporary IR theory is based on Western values and, consequently, is incapable of adequately explaining the distinctive nature of the involvement of non-Western countries in global processes.[3][4][5] And vice versa, researchers who think that IR theory must be universal see the task of enriching the theory with new ideas as top priority for Chinese scholars.[6][7]
These debates in the Chinese academic community immediately became the object of very intense study by Western researchers. The subject has been addressed by Barry Buzan,[8] William Callahan,[9] Linsay Cunningham-Cross,[10] David Shambaugh,[11] A. Korolev,[12] A.D. Voskresenskii,[13] E.N. Grachikov.[14] But most of the papers by these sch ....

United States , Bali Ji , David Shambaugh , Svetlanav Krivokhizh , Barak Obama , William Callahan , Hans Morgenthau , Linsay Cunningham Cross , Chan Fei , States Zhan Guo , Barry Buzan , Yan Xuetong , Elenad Soboleva , World Bank , Theory Of International Relations , International Norms , Chinese Journal Of International Politics , National Interests And Foreign Policy Strategy , Ministry Of State Security , China Institute Of Contemporary International Relations , Oxford University , Tsinghua University , Un Security Council , International Relations , Henry Kissinger , Professor Yan ,