Stay updated with breaking news from Nel argument. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
this letter which is dated today is written from president trump s attorney to judge wood who will be overseeing a very high stakes hearing tomorrow in new york about all those ver sensitive materials that were seized by the fbi in the raid of michael cohen s office, of his hotel room and his home as well as the seizure of his phones and this is something that i don t think has ever been said before, at least not to to my knowledge on the news. the president of the united states is offering to make himself personally available for any review or screening of the evidence that the fbi seized of his lawyer. it s an unusual offer to say the least and with that let me get right to a well assembled panel. senator richard blumenthal, former senator byron dorgen and eugene robinson from the the washington post which has broken some of these stories your colleagues have. i ll go down the line. dealer s choice on which aspects of this you want to speak to and, senator, your view of wh ....
Struck down, 3.0. neal katyal seed to hit his stride on the other part on the fight with congress part. you have a lot more legal experience than i do. it made me wonder whether there s something he thinks in terms of his strategy that he might win not on rjt you but on that way. neal understands the way to bring kennedy along. we ll make nel argument we can if we need to the convince kennedy. the arguments are very clear and runs afoul of the whole idea of the executive branch cannot trump congress and override the ina. let me play another important moment from inside the courtroom. there s been a lot of talking whether people will resign what trump does. jeff sessions reportedly threat he might on a mule ter issue. rod rosenstein talking about what would happen if he left, don mcgahn threatened to resign. who is left. here was that very idea in the travel ban context that came up in court. it was argued in a case this ....