Brother Gone 35 Years Claims Ownership of Cattle in Dispute
Paul Lopez “The court ruled that the defendant is to make necessary rebranding within three months, and so no further order is necessary with respect to the cattle. So basically, what the court is saying is that your brother is to make necessary rebranding to a certain amount of cattle. You are saying that your brother does not even own any cattle to make necessary rebranding?” Clifford Moody “I said four. Now, the problem with that is that he lied to the judge. He said that when I left my cattle with him in 1984, he had twelve head of animal and that is a lie. Number two, he said...