Ceo of one of the biggest la firms with a pretty robust practice, supreme cour practice, but for the court. so, you know, i reached ou when i saw that this happened, this timing, was just one bi coincidence or what exactl happened here? i did speak with mr. duffy, he told me that he did become aware of who the owner was throughout the course of this, but it s still unclear exactly when that happened like i said, there was this bi new york times story in march. this, then, went through in may, so it was two months befor that gorsuch actually wa identified as the owner of thi property here is the problem, chris there s no problem here, technically. there is no violation, no laws were broken, and according t ethics experts, that is th problem, that this doesn t violate anything that you ca have a transaction like this take place with this timing an with someone with such interes before the court and have it b
Times reported in march of tha year, chris, that gorsuch was, indeed, one of the co-owners it was two months after that i nine days after gorsuch wa sworn in that he finally finds a buyer. that buyer happens to be the ceo of one of the biggest la firms with a pretty robust practice, supreme cour practice, but for the court. so, you know, i reached ou when i saw that this happened, this timing, was just one bi coincidence or what exactl happened here? i did speak with mr. duffy, he told me that he did become aware of who the owner was throughout the course of this, but it s still unclear exactly when that happened like i said, there was this bi new york times story in march. this, then, went through in may, so it was two months befor that gorsuch actually wa