Live Breaking News & Updates on Non credit

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from Non credit on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in Non credit and stay connected to the pulse of your community

CRCS extends deadline to align with new Act till 30th Sept

On the request of some multi-state cooperative societies, the Central Registrar of Cooperative Societies has

Central-registrar-of-cooperative-societies , Central-registrar , Cooperative-societies , Federal-multi-state-cooperative-societies , Breaking , Cooperative , Extension , Mscss , Non-credit , Societies , Co-op-news-snippets

Verified Live

cartwright king. do not _ been made by the criminal law team cartwright king. do not think- been made by the criminal law team cartwright king. do not think it - cartwright king. do not think it would — cartwright king. do not think it would have _ cartwright king. do not think it would have been— cartwright king. do not think it would have been worth - cartwright king. do not think it - would have been worth investigating this inquiry? — would have been worth investigating this inquiry? this _ would have been worth investigating this inquiry? this inquiry— would have been worth investigating this inquiry? this inquiry was - this inquiry? this inquiry was solely— this inquiry? this inquiry was solely about _ this inquiry? this inquiry was solely about the _ this inquiry? this inquiry was solely about the non—credit i this inquiry? this inquiry wasl solely about the non—credit of people's— solely about the non—credit of people's money— solely about the non—credit of people's money being - solely about the non—credit of people's money being paid . solely about the non—credit of. people's money being paid into solely about the non—credit of - people's money being paid into their account. _ people's money being paid into their account. which— people's money being paid into their account, which ultimately— people's money being paid into their account, which ultimately caused - people's money being paid into their| account, which ultimately caused the charity— account, which ultimately caused the charity to _ account, which ultimately caused the charity to have — account, which ultimately caused the charity to have difficulty _ account, which ultimately caused the charity to have difficulty with - charity to have difficulty with their — charity to have difficulty with their cash _ charity to have difficulty with their cash flow _ charity to have difficulty with their cash flow problems. i charity to have difficulty with i their cash flow problems. that charity to have difficulty with - their cash flow problems. that is their cash flow problems. that is the inquiry— their cash flow problems. that is the inquiry i _ their cash flow problems. that is the inquiry i looked _ their cash flow problems. that is the inquiry i looked at. _ their cash flow problems. that is the inquiry i looked at. did - their cash flow problems. that is the inquiry i looked at.— their cash flow problems. that is the inquiry i looked at. did you not think about — the inquiry i looked at. did you not think about looking _ the inquiry i looked at. did you not think about looking into _ the inquiry i looked at. did you not think about looking into the - the inquiry i looked at. did you not. think about looking into the reasons for that— think about looking into the reasons for that discrepancy in a the discrepancy was quite simple. when the customer _ discrepancy was quite simple. when the customer came _ discrepancy was quite simple. when the customer came in _ discrepancy was quite simple. when the customer came in to _ discrepancy was quite simple. when the customer came in to deposit money. — the customer came in to deposit money. they— the customer came in to deposit money. they did _ the customer came in to deposit money, they did not _ the customer came in to deposit money, they did not deposit - the customer came in to deposit money, they did not deposit the j money, they did not deposit the money — money, they did not deposit the money that _ money, they did not deposit the money. that was _ money, they did not deposit the money. that was the _ money, they did not deposit the money. that was the inquiry. i money. that was the inquiry. whatever— money. that was the inquiry. whatever happened - money. that was the inquiry. whatever happened before, i money. that was the inquiry. i whatever happened before, as i money. that was the inquiry. - whatever happened before, as i say, to use _ whatever happened before, as i say, to use the _ whatever happened before, as i say, to use the word — whatever happened before, as i say, to use the word mitigation, - whatever happened before, as i say, to use the word mitigation, they- to use the word mitigation, they haven't— to use the word mitigation, they haven't brought _ to use the word mitigation, they haven't brought up _ to use the word mitigation, they haven't brought up to _ to use the word mitigation, they haven't brought up to say, - to use the word mitigation, they haven't brought up to say, this i to use the word mitigation, they. haven't brought up to say, this and this happened _ haven't brought up to say, this and this happened. they— haven't brought up to say, this and this happened. theyjust_ haven't brought up to say, this and this happened. theyjust said - haven't brought up to say, this and this happened. theyjust said theyl this happened. theyjust said they were covering _ this happened. theyjust said they were covering up— this happened. theyjust said they were covering up losses, - this happened. theyjust said they were covering up losses, but - this happened. theyjust said they were covering up losses, but no . were covering up losses, but no substantiation— were covering up losses, but no substantiation with _ were covering up losses, but no substantiation with it. _ were covering up losses, but no substantiation with it. the - were covering up losses, but no i substantiation with it. the inquiry was purely— substantiation with it. the inquiry was purely about— substantiation with it. the inquiry was purely about non—crediting . substantiation with it. the inquiryj was purely about non—crediting of people's— was purely about non—crediting of people's money _ was purely about non—crediting of people's money. you _ was purely about non-crediting of people's money-— was purely about non-crediting of people's money. you were aware that an important — people's money. you were aware that an important part _ people's money. you were aware that an important part of _ people's money. you were aware that an important part of their _ people's money. you were aware that an important part of their case - people's money. you were aware that an important part of their case in - an important part of their case in criminal— an important part of their case in criminal proceedings was that the underlying discrepancy was caused by bugs. _ underlying discrepancy was caused by bugs, errors or defects in horizon? as i say. _

Councilfor-the-inquiry , Money , People , Doesn-t-it , Account , Cash , Charity , Difficulty , Worth , King , Non-credit , Charity-account

BBC News Now

page eight, i would like to look at, please. is itfairto is it fair to say that from the statements we have seen, the reliability of the horizon system was front and centre of their defence?— was front and centre of their defence? ., �* , ., , ., defence? that's what they are indicating. _ defence? that's what they are indicating, but _ defence? that's what they are indicating, but however, - defence? that's what they are indicating, but however, they| indicating, but however, they weren't having permanent shortages, because the audit showed a surplus, and as i have explained, this inquiry concerned the non—credit of deposit slips. that's the initial inquiry that we were looking at. so you didn't think it was necessary to look beyond your case and look at their defence and look at the allegations they had made about the horizon system and provide them with disclosure as to issues with the horizon? i disclosure as to issues with the horizon? .., �* disclosure as to issues with the horizon? .. �* , ., disclosure as to issues with the horizon? �* , ., ., , horizon? i can't explain it in any other way- _ horizon? i can't explain it in any other way. the _ horizon? i can't explain it in any other way. the inquiry - horizon? i can't explain it in any other way. the inquiry was - horizon? i can't explain it in any| other way. the inquiry was about horizon? i can't explain it in any - other way. the inquiry was about the non—credit of people's cash deposits. the other is a second issue, on why they had committed

Page , Reliability , Statements , Itfairto , Eight , 58300 , 2000 , Horizon-system , Audit , Defence , Shortages , People-surplus

BBC News Now

in the horizon system that caused that discrepancy, would you still have prosecuted them for covering that up? have prosecuted them for covering that u - ? ., �* . have prosecuted them for covering that u? ., �, ., , have prosecuted them for covering thatu? ., �, ., , .,., that up? that's not my decision. that decision _ that up? that's not my decision. that decision would _ that up? that's not my decision. that decision would be - that up? that's not my decision. that decision would be made - that up? that's not my decision. that decision would be made by| that up? that's not my decision. . that decision would be made by the criminal law team cartright king. did you not think that was something worth investigating? hat did you not think that was something worth investigating?— worth investigating? not in this inrui . worth investigating? not in this inquiry- this — worth investigating? not in this inquiry. this inquiry _ worth investigating? not in this inquiry. this inquiry was - worth investigating? not in this inquiry. this inquiry was solely | inquiry. this inquiry was solely about the nonreceipt... sorry, the non—credit of people's money being paid into their account, which ultimately caused the charity to have difficulty with their cash flow problems. that's the inquiry i looked at. did you not think about looking into the reasons for that discrepancy? the discrepancy was quite simple. they did not when the customer came in to deposit money, they did not deposit the money. that was the inquiry. whatever happened before, as i say, to use the web mitigation, they haven't brought up and said, this happened at this thing, they just said they were covering up losses but no substantiation with it. the inquiry was solely about

Horizon-system , Team , Discrepancy , Decision , King , Defect , Have , Error , Criminal-law , U , U- , Thatu

BBC News Now

non—credit of people's money. you were aware that an important part of their case in the criminal proceedings was that the underlying discrepancy was caused by bugs, errors or defects in horizon. rays t errors or defects in horizon. as i said, errors or defects in horizon. as i said. not — errors or defects in horizon. as i said. riot in _ errors or defects in horizon. as i said, not in this _ errors or defects in horizon. as i said, not in this case. _ errors or defects in horizon. " i said, not in this case. this case must earlier that they did not credit somebody�*s deposit. you as an individual, me as a business or somebody else is a treasure i have made a complaint saying, i am paying money to a post office and it is not in my account. that is what was being investigated on this occasion. can we look at 440036, plays? irate can we look at 440036, plays? we have can we look at 440036, plays? - have seen defence statements in other cases, and this is the defence statement in the— statement in the seftons' case, her defence in the _ statement in the seftons' case, her defence in the criminal— statement in the seftons' case, herj defence in the criminal proceedings brought against her. can we please look at paragraph five in the first page, the bottom of that page, please? the 18th ofjuly, 2012. she says as follows: the defendant

Neald-case , People , Case , Money , Horizon , Discrepancy , Defects , Proceedings , Bugs , Errors , Part , Non-credit

Verified Live

once there were suggestions the it system was not working. they were prosecuted for the giro deposit slips not going in. and if you were sure that the underlying problem was a bug, error or defect in the horizon system that caused that discrepancy, would you still have prosecuted them for covering that up? that is not my decision. that decision would be made by the criminal law team. did you not think that was something worth investigating? not in this inquiry, this inquiry was solely about the non—receipt, the non—credit of people's money being paid into their account which ultimately caused the charity to have difficulty with their cash flow problems. that is the inquiry that i looked at. did you not think about looking into the reasons, looking into the reasons for that discrepancy? the discrepancy was quite simple, they did not... ..when the customer came in to deposit money, they did not deposit the money.

It-system , Problem , Giro-deposit , Suggestions , Something , Horizon-system , Decision , Discrepancy , Defect , Criminal-law-team , Error , Bug

Verified Live

that was the inquiry. whatever happened before, as i say, to use the word mitigation, they haven't brought up saying this happened, they were covering up losses, but no substantiation with it. the inquiry was solely about non—credit of people's money. you were aware that an important part of their case in the criminal proceedings was that the underlying discrepancy was caused by bugs, errors or defects in horizon. not in this case, this case was solely that they did not credit somebody�*s deposit. if you as an individual, me as a business or somebody else as a treasurer, they'd made the complaint, saying i am paying money to the post office and it's not in my account. that is what was looked into on this occasion. the post office has paid fujitsu over £95m to extend the troubled horizon it system for two years after a plan to move to amazon had to be abandoned.

Public-inquiry , Haven-t , Word , Mitigation , Substantiation , Losses , Part , Case , People , Money , Discrepancy , Non-credit

Santa Monica Loses a Legend

Santa Monica Loses a Legend
smdp.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from smdp.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.

Japan , Alexandria , Al-iskandariyah , Egypt , Japanese , Scott-silverman , Al-roker , Katie-miller , Jerry-rosenblum , Phil-brock , Santa-monica , Hillary-clinton