SFGTV March 6, 2013
For egress. A couple of misrepresentations in the appellants brief. We have direct access for the public way. That is very important as far as the egress goes. He states that we dont, we do. So just, so, so this is overhead, please . I mean this is essentially what we are looking at, just the blank wall, this 20 and a half feet long and our proposed deck that we are proposing the to reconfigure is back this far, basically, if you look on my plans that is where it is at and it has no, in our opinion it has very little to no impact on the appellant. Her building extends as do the other structure...