Page 19 - Office Eastern News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Their health care needs. All right. Im happy to end on that note with apologies to the panel because i had not vetted that question before hand. You did that remarkably well. Join me in thanking ian, justin and jody. ; fort knox was chosen because it was the most impenetrable. There had been lots of gold already transferred there. So the secretary of the treasury gives permission to use a portion of the depository. Tonight, the decision to move americas most important Historical Documents to fort knox on december 26, 1941. First, he has to make the decision, what documents would be there. So h...

Their health care needs. All right. Im happy to end on that note with apologies to the panel because i had not vetted that question before hand. You did that remarkably well. Join me in thanking ian, justin and jody. ; fort knox was chosen because it was the most impenetrable. There had been lots of gold already transferred there. So the secretary of the treasury gives permission to use a portion of the depository. Tonight, the decision to move americas most important Historical Documents to fort knox on december 26, 1941. First, he has to make the decision, what documents would be there. So h...

When you say we are talking about a remedy not in terms of finding a violation. Dont say you are implementing congresss intent when you look at what a congress 60 years later would do. When you are rendering a gender discriminatory statute by leveling up or down you are not using congresss intent. But you will ask what would they have wanted if they knew they couldnt make this discrimination. I thought if you have to go back to 52, they are going to either have to take the benefit away from the woman or give it to the man. They hate that. They get into trouble when they take benefits away. Tha...

When you say we are talking about a remedy not in terms of finding a violation. Dont say you are implementing congresss intent when you look at what a congress 60 years later would do. When you are rendering a gender discriminatory statute by leveling up or down you are not using congresss intent. But you will ask what would they have wanted if they knew they couldnt make this discrimination. I thought if you have to go back to 52, they are going to either have to take the benefit away from the woman or give it to the man. They hate that. They get into trouble when they take benefits away. Tha...

When you say we are talking about a remedy not in terms of finding a violation. Dont say you are implementing congresss intent when you look at what a congress 60 years later would do. When you are rendering a gender discriminatory statute by leveling up or down you are not using congresss intent. But you will ask what would they have wanted if they knew they couldnt make this discrimination. I thought if you have to go back to 52, they are going to either have to take the benefit away from the woman or give it to the man. They hate that. They get into trouble when they take benefits away. Tha...