Stay updated with breaking news from Parlatore hasn t. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
leaves in disgrace. then, breaking news on the debt ceiling. and progressive congressman mark joins me to call out kevin mccarthy s dangerous game. i am charles blow in for mehdi hasan. let s get started. tonight we begin with a surprising allegation from a former member of donald trump s legal team. tim peloton is now publicly blasting a current trump lawyer just days after the advising the former president on the special counsel s classified documents investigation. peloton longtime legal association boris epstein attempted to enter fear with searches for quote, in my opinion he has not been very honest with us or the cline on certain things. there were certain things like the searches that he had attempted to interfere with. parlatore, who said he had left the trump team due to infighting, may defending trump more difficult. a trump campaign spokesman said that his assertions were categorically false. it is also worth noting that parlatore hasn t just serve ....
Attorney suggested that the president records act had empower trump to ignore a federal subpoena, which isn t even close to being true. by all accounts, the justice department controversy is intensifying. and a federal indictment remains a distinct possibility. all while trump s legal team is mired in lies, infighting, and allegations of interference, which sounds like any other day in trump world. let s bring in my panel. christina greer, associate professor of political science at ford university, david jolly, former republican congressman and msnbc political analyst, and denise vallas, msnbc political analyst. danny, i want to first get your reaction to these claims about parlatore, who says that epstein was blocking the lawyers from getting information. i think one of the, 1 am a striking things he is saying is that epstein personally ....
Just because there is a large company. it s one thing to point the personal attacks that fox made against your client which are bad, of course. but the thing that would need to stand out but they purposely spread false information about your client, how do you do the? sure, there s a couple of different buckets in the case. the first bucket of provably false statements that we raised in the complaint are related to nina wanting to and working to censor american speech. if you take a look at anything that she has done in her career and her writing and her public statements it is very clear that she doesn t believe in censorship. especially with a solution to disinformation with the board in particular you can look at what its authority was as an advisory board and you can know that there wasn t any ability to censor anyone. the second bucket of false statements was that after the boards work was paused, after ....
Cline on certain things. there were certain things like the searches that he had attempted to interfere with. parlatore, who said he had left the trump team due to infighting, may defending trump more difficult. a trump campaign spokesman said that his assertions were categorically false. it is also worth noting that parlatore hasn t just served on the legal team as a legal counsel. the attorney also testified late last year before the grand jury hearing, hearing on evidence about the classified documents case. what is more, according to a report this week from cnn, officials with the national archives have been informed to team trump that they are prepared to provide investigators with the records that show that trump and his top advisers had acknowledged the correct declassification process by he was president. just hours after that report was published, another trump ....
Only two months i believe. there were multiple hosts on fox who claimed she wasn t fired. she was was not fired. she resigned, that s very checkable, anyone over there could have checked. the third fall statement was that nina wanted to have twitter created tool to allow verified users to other users tweets. their entire source for this was a selectively edited video that it come from some user on twitter. if you look at the entire interview of her which was publicly available she had nothing to do with the tool in this into the, in every interview expresses her very skepticism about that tool. all those things where things fox shows not to mention and instead stick to their narrative that was meant to outrage viewers and we turn ....