An attempt to once again take up the nuclear arguments of influence on our partners, so that they would, relatively speaking, think or help us, but i think that our europeans understand that ukraine must be helped, because otherwise the war will come to their land, and this is the conclusion that they probably made a long time ago, that is why certain countries, such as france, come up with such good initiatives, although some countries, such as germany, if now we see the taurus missile, which we desperately need, after all. All the politicians and the military, even in germany, talk about the feasibility of transferring these missiles to ukraine, and scholz is still afraid and says that oh, oh, this missile can hit moscow there will be bad consequences, and then it is better not to transfer this missile to ukraine , i still think that the sholts will push back, but it is still the background, the lack of perception of the real situation, well, it is a little annoying, to be honest, by
The Baltic States was launched a little bit different process, then the mini ministry of defense of the Baltic States, they identified the resources that they needed to strengthen their own national defense, even without the participation of nato, as organization, without article five. And then the mechanisms were launched, and the United States and european allies launched those resources, placed them, deployed them in the baltic countries. And built them into the own defense of these countries , that is, now there are nato units that should come under, well, other countries that should come under the command of the baltic countries, if it begins, not even because article 5 is not included, but russian aggression begins, i i think, for us, the main thing we can do and the fastest and most understandable thing is to offer our allies, namely, how we currently lack resources in defense, well, in addition to Human Resources to actually fight on the battlefield, what resources do we have,
To use this european money for production in europe itself, including for ukraine, but in europe itself, so it is necessary to combine, i do not think that there is such a universal solution, and not it can be said that what france says is a universal decision, it is an important and very positive decision, but what is said about the Defense Industry in france, it is rather a joint Defense Strategy in the perspective of 10 years , including against russia, and what germany and the countries of Eastern Europe are saying is what needs to be done already this year. Oleksiy, i would like to ask one more component, these are macrons proposals. Isnt this happening, well finally the blurring of these red lines or i dont know what color lines regarding the fact that nato should not get involved in hostilities there on the territory of ukraine, and this step of blurring these lines. Was probably one of the impetus for these traditionally harsh statements by putin was during a speech before the
Industry and with specific weapons right now, but in a political sense this is a huge step. Mr. Oleksii, thank you very much for these very important, specific accents related to macrons statement, with frances position on at the current stage, i think that it will acquire new capacities. Thank you very much for the inclusion , i will remind our viewers that it was oleksiy yezhak, an expert of the National Institute of strategic studies, where we talked about the fact that there are certain external resources, reserves in order to support ukraine in dealings with the russian federation, we see that these resources are acquiring such new trends that are extremely interesting from the point of view of the possibility of using the military and Foreign Countries of the eu and nato countries on the territory of ukraine to perform certain functions that are not combat, but which have a Significant Impact on increasing the potential of our armed forces, our defense capability from defense to
At the financing stage and at the stage of involvement of our Defense Enterprises in this joint european production. Well , by the way, as i understand it, france is going this way, because when it talks there about a coalition about artillery or a coalition about longrange means of impression, in parallel , it is said that a fund is being created, which should use resources for the purchase of these samples, but there. One way or another, there is a certain bias in the french proposals regarding their samples, there the tsai is french, the missiles are french, this impression that the french give a little less weapons to ukraine than to germany, but try more to load their defenses. Do you not have such a certain, well, dualism in the behavior of the french . There is, of course, so you have to see in france what this country is, it is european political. Leader, but in matters of money and all these matters , well, they have their own interests, of course, the germans have a lot of mo