Live Breaking News & Updates on Perimeter

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from Perimeter on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in Perimeter and stay connected to the pulse of your community

Ayman

candidate, anyone who wants to seek this office the license to do whatever they want, to be corrupt, to do harmful things to our republic. the idea that this would be stamped by the supreme court, stamped with judicial approval is undermining everything our politics is suppedo be. about >> danny, i want your reaction to this. >> we have a presid has to look over his shoulder or her shoulder every time he or she has to make a contial decision, or after a leave office, am i going to jail for this with my political opponents take power, that inevitably dampens the ability of the president. >> is that a realistic? here >> it is. presidents need not worry as long as what they're doing is squirrelly official. and effect, it doesn't even need to be squirrelly with an official act. i just need to be within the outer perimeter. as we can see, trump is not satisfy. that he can't shelter in a court what he did in january, on january 6th and why are

Donald-trump , Things , Office , Anyone , Republic , Everything , U-s-supreme-court , Idea , License , Approval , Presid , Reaction

Ayman

candidate, anyone who wants to seek this office the license to do whatever they want, to be corrupt, to do harmful things to our republic. the idea that this would be stamped by the supreme court, stamped with judicial approval is undermining everything our politics is supposed to be. about >> danny, i want your reaction to this. look over his shoulder or her shoulder everyhe oshe has to make a controversial decision, or after a leave office, i going to jail for this with my political opponents take power, that inevitably dampens the ability of the president. >> is that a realistic? >> it is. presidents need not worry as long as what they're doing is squirrelly official. and effect, it doesn't even need to be squirrelly with an official act. i just need to be within the outer perimeter. as we can see, trump is not satisfy. that he can't shelter in a court what he did in january, on january 6th and why are there too, was something anything other than a candidate

Donald-trump , Things , Everything , Office , Anyone , Politics , Republic , U-s-supreme-court , Idea , License , Approval , Decision

BBC News

the local police are saying this morning it started out at around a50 metres away from the perimeter. it is starting to edge closer and closer to pipes, electricity surprise. there is a biotechnology greenhouse which was an deed back in november so in terms of valuables,. that is due to go under the lava. authorities are predicting that actually the main fish i was going to reach the time that this new one we have rear head about really increases concerns. as i said local authorities are deeply concerned about what this will mean. it has something they will work out how to protect these fishing villages. we

Police , Perimeter , Pipes , Electricity-surprise , Lava , Biotechnology-greenhouse , Terms , Deed-back , Valuables , One , Authorities , Concerns

The Story With Martha MacCallum

The Story With Martha MacCallum
vimarsana.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from vimarsana.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.

Martha , Conversations , Inaudible , Background-sounds , Lot-of-trump-support , It , Part , Story , Protesters , Places , White-house , Scene

The Source With Kaitlan Collins

first of all, i couldn't possibly agree with it because my position supported bide many scholars and opposed by other scholars is once a person is out of office he or she is not subject to impeachment, so it couldn't be that down the road a person -- if a president was found to have been in office ordered a hit on a political opponent, that president would then have to be impeached and convicted before it could be prosecuted. it wouldn't be an official act. there's no possible way any conception of immunity could see that within the outer perimeter of an official act. i think he wasn't prepared for the -- >> how do you define official act, though? because i do think that is going to be one of the thorniest issues here. trump is claiming that -- even though i should note that trump later said he was working in his personal capacity as a candidate, but how do you define it? because that is a major issue before this court right now. >> i don't think there's any real definition of it. what the court said in nixon vs. fitzgerald, for example -- >> but that's a civil case. >> that's right.

President , Person , Office , All , It , Scholars , Impeachment , Couldn-t , Position , Road , Way , Immunity

The Source With Kaitlan Collins

>> he has threate civil actions for actions taken acts and certainly within the outer perimeter. whether you agree or disagree with what he did, whether you think the information was good or bad, the immunity concept doesn't present granular which inquiry into whether he was right or wrong. he was entitled to be right or wrong about the election fraud. the second part is a person impeached or convicted can then be prosecuted to the law according to the law, so on. there's an argument to be made by implication a person acquitted by the impeachment can't be prosecuted. the justice department did a $2,000 -- the year 2000 analysis of this issue, very thorough -- >> okay, david, let me just stop this there because you call this granular. i don't think people would say it's granular. you're saying there are parts of immunity if trump's attorney is arguing that this pertained to his job, these were his official duties as president. that is not, though, the argument that his attorney was making in court the other day. there was this hypothetical that one of the judges raised of course we all know it by now that if a president ordered seal team six to kill a political opponent would they be immune from prosecution unless they were impeached and convicted? do you agree with that? >> no, i do not.

Person , Part , Law , Immunity-concept-doesn-t , Actions , Argument , Information , Threate , Election-fraud , Perimeter , Acts , Bad

The ReidOut

fitzgerald. that immunity sets the official above the law as, quote, rhetorically chilling but wholly unjustified. >> in today's hearing, donald trump's legal team made several references to another former president, richard nixon. specifically a 1982 supreme court case, where nixon was personally sued by a defense department whistleblower who claimed he was wrongfully terminated. the court ruled in nixon's favor, stating a former president is immune from lawsuits in civil cases, and that such immunity extends to all acts within the outer perimeter of his duties of office. the ruling did not, however, mention criminal charges. nor how overturning a democratic election so they can stay in office forever counts as any part of the perimeters of a president's official duty. meanwhile, the special counsel also cited nixon, although a completely different case, to bolster their argument. referencing u.s. v. nixon, the

Donald-trump , Statory-immunity , Hearing , Richard-nixon , Team , Above-the-law , Official , References , Rhetorically-chilling-but-wholly-unjustified , Quote , Federal-court , Supreme-court

The ReidOut

wbr id="wbr15600"/> the outer perimeter of his official duties. but a marked contrast to that, the supreme court rejected absolute immunity when nixon complying with the subpoena to provide tapes that he had, white house tapes, that had been subpoenaed as evidence in that criminal prosecution. what the report said there, and i'm going to look over here to read it exactly, is that neither the doctrine of separation of powers nor the need for confidentiality of high level communications without more can sustain an absolute unqualified presidential privilege of immunity from judicial process in all circumstances. so the court made this distinction, and the dramatic questions that judge pan asked today about ordering seal team 6 to murder a political opponent, i think, really illustrate why there can't possibly be that kind of immunity. it's nothing our framers would have ever expected. /b>

Supreme-court , Statory-immunity , Tapes , Duties , Perimeter , Subpoena , Contrast , Prosecution , Doctrine , Need , Powers , White-house

All In With Chris Hayes

cases brought by former police officers, members of congress, who have sued trump civilly, and in that case, the civil rule, president does have immunity within the outer perimeter of his official duties. because of that they send it back to the lower court to determine what was he doing here? was he acting in his official capacity or personal capacity? that makes sense when you talk about the civil rule. but here the court has to fashion a rule in the first place. judge chutkan's lower court decision scissors no commit criminal immunity of any kind. so it's unclear if they will need to remand at all. and they're supposed to take these factors. true okay charles coleman, lisa rubin, thank. you and coming up, and mr. gumbel new evidence on what it means. e on what it means. means. >> (pensive music) (footsteps crunching)

President , Case , Cases , Immunity , Congress , Rule , Members , Lower-court , Police-officers , Perimeter , Duties , Trump-civilly