Stay updated with breaking news from Person saying. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Against donald trump and get rid of this nightmare . Dude, ive been preaching it for the last six or eight months. I dont know why the party doesnt corral around one of these individuals on the stage to just say, this is the horse thats going to ride us to a brave new world. And they just cant. Because that base, small though it is, hes outsized in the money it produces, and the power it wields. And that, even in a parliamentary system, can overwhelm the system sometimes. Yeah, i was going to say, just look what happened to will hurd. As you said, booed there just for speaking truth to power. On a personal note, michael, i just want to say that its the first time ive seen you in person. Thank you so much for filling in for me a couple of weeks ago, i really appreciate it. The time off i owe you one, my friend. No pleasure, no pleasure. That just took a cold brew youve got it. Next time i see a pint consider it done. Good evening and welcome to ayman. The case against donald trump for t ....
the capital of kyiv. ukrainian officials say russian missiles targeted power stations in the east bank part of the city causing a fire at one of the facilities. ukraine also says russian strikes targeted infrastructure in the kharkiv and lviv regions in the country s east and west. cnn s scott mclain is in kyiv for us. scott, are things quieter at least right now? reporter: yes, fredricka, the air raid alert ended an hour ago but it lasted for two and a half hours. this was the second one today. this morning we were woken up by the very distinctive sound of explosions that could are heard from right here in central kyiv. there were three of them. luckily, there was relatively minimal damage. no injuries reported in this area. not long after that, there was another round of sirens and this one, the officials made very clear, that it was actually incoming missiles that had been spotted entering the country. so people took this one very seriously. we went and sheltered i ....
the beat with ari melber starts right now. hi, ari. hi, nicolle. i m going to pull a minilawrence. i was trying to give you your seconds back. we have a full breakdown of all these jury questions tonight, which is so interesting. that s what we re going to do. i can t wait. i m going to get upstairs fast enough so i don t miss anything. have a great show. thank you. thank you to nicolle. and welcome to the beat. i m ari melber. today for the first time ever, donald trump s fate in this criminal trial is now in the hands of a jury of his peers. the presides judge giving the standard and detailed instructions to these 12 jurors in a case that s anything but standard. we know that. and tonight we can report several brand-new developments from the jury s first day of deliberations, which lasted over four hours. we have now gleaned new clues about what they re discussing, what they re considering, what exact evidence and testimony they are focused on today, and ....
You d expect from someone who is acting lawfully. not just in a sense of trying to destroy evidence, but he s also been making the case that he had a right to these documents, and yet here he is trying to get rid of the evidence that he has those documents, allegedly. the thing that i m most interested in here is what evidence the special counsel has beyond a competing eyewitness. if you have nothing on paper, on tape, if they re meeting by the bushes and in closets and the only evidence you re going to have is a testimony of one person, you re going to have three defendants, all of whom are saying together that we didn t do this, what this person saying. so if one person has testimony gets others, that s not as strong as i would like to see. but that may be what they have. the second thing is my ....
Evidence the special counsel has beyond a competing eyewitness. if you have nothing on paper, on tape, if they re meeting by the bushes and in closets and the only evidence you re going to have is a testimony of one person, you re going to have three defendants, all of whom are saying together that we didn t do this, what this person saying. so if one person has testimony gets others, that s not as strong as i would like to see. but that may be what they have. the second thing is my understanding, and i could be wrong, my understanding is the trump universe is also paying for this third defendants defense. and that makes it less likely that there will be some flipping among the other defendants. so, the problem here is the structures around the legal system and our political system just cannot quite catch up to ....