trump s own defense, if you will, more or less. it s not quite the behavior you d expect from someone who is acting lawfully. not just in a sense of trying to destroy evidence, but he s also been making the case that he had a right to these documents, and yet here he is trying to get rid of the evidence that he has those documents, allegedly. the thing that i m most interested in here is what evidence the special counsel has beyond a competing eyewitness. if there is nothing on paper, on tape, if they re meeting by the bushes and in closets and the only evidence you re going to have is a testimony of one person, you re going to have three defendants, all of whom are saying together that we didn t do this, what this person saying. so if one person has testimony gets others, that s not as strong as i would like to see.
or the police believe papa roger, who is no longer in the group, is kohberger. then there is this video taken at an idaho prayer vigil for the four murder victims prior to kohberger s arrest with many people hypothesizing online. people think that the murderer attended the vigil. reporter: this person saying, bryan kohberger spotted, prayer vigil, moscow, idaho. and this person, looks like the psycho. but a tv drew from the news magazine inside edition a was at the vigil and has videotape of the man close up. it s definitely not kohberger. we are not showing his face to protect his identity. and then there is this. a lot of people have been asking who is rebecca scofield. reporter: a woman who calls herself ashley solves mystery produced videos on tiktok accusing a university of idaho pro professor of participating the killings. the tiktoker, ashley gallard, posted this video two weelks
raymond: final scraps of grievance that can be mentioned, this chrissy tikhon stage a comeback while sharon osborne and jk rowling are in perpetual punish corner. one person said you said something to her to this person saying, quote, i can t wait for you to die and you apologized you apologize profusely. having time to digest it all and look back and realize honestly there is so much time to grow and to learn and become more empathetic. does everybody get to be forgiven for unfortunate nasty comments? does everybody get to be more empathetic? let s hope so and what about hunter biden who made millions off of his ink spittle canvases this year. if you or i spitting through a straw somebody would call the police but when the president is your daddy it is called art. though i m grieved by his hygiene failures no one elevated coughing this year to the artform the president biden did. and the end of october,
to ensure that congress, when it appropriates money, has the final say in how that money is distributed. and the defense department, the state department, whoever else are the distributors of that money know that process well. and in this case they cannot legally hold that money back just whimsically, and that s what appears to have been the sort of graveman of what she was saying. this hold back without any explanation, without use of the interagency process or congressional consideration was an illegal act. that s why you saw the testimony the other week from the omb person saying, look, i m not going to sign off on this because it s not lawful as far as i m concerned. so they brought on a political person to do the signing off on it. what s fascinating, too, as we look at all of this is that from the beginning one of the reasons that we were given was the reason the aid was held up
mr. bannon isn t there, mr. kelly is there. mr. spicer is not there. yes, a pugilistic president, but the demeanor, decorum, has shifted. as we all know that can change at any moment in time. interesting sidebar on the espn thing that came up with the espn person saying. jemele hill. and we ve blurred entertainment, sports and politics and if every network executive is on the firing line for either side when somebody starts to go a bit over the line aren t representing the network. they re people in the world. go ahead. i don t like the fact, the white house is calling on a private institution to fire anybody. having said that, you are doing their job for them by going all crazy about this. this is what they want. they want to create i m not crazy, but i spoke on behalf of the white house, and what it mean, the world is