Page 47 - Peter Warfield News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

happen if she on her own would decide to turnover the documents that they have made a big deal about keeping away, i don't think that miss patterson is an independent actor, i think that the department head is and that is who you should be looking at as to who has responsibility, that is crucial. >> okay, mr. warfield. commissioners? >> commissioner studley? >> is there a rebuttal? >> there is a rebuttal. >> there is and i was going to say, i would like to speak to the procedural matter if you want to take the rebuttal first that is fine >> just quickly. >> i think that mr. warfield ...

me into our office of a year's worth of work and as you have done good due diligence of talking to me and observing me and talking to the people that i supervise and you wrote up an evaluation and at the end of that you have the opportunity to sign-off on it with no comment and say that i agree and i have a comment or i disagree and here are the reasons why. but you don't get to do is to have the opportunity to change the words within the evaluation. and i think that is in many ways what the role of your 150-word summary can do when you are summarizing the minutes because the minutes...

the letter about the complainant was peter warfield and then he goes on and defines, and so he talks about on page 2 of the letter, they referred it as a willful violation under section 67 hour miss patterson is not a elected official and will be held under chapter two. if you look at the order of determination and all of the documents, over and over and over again, mr. st. croix has overlooked the fact that it was the library users association against the arts commission which is headed by a department head who out to be responsible if not maybe the city attorney or the mayor. >> th...

>> your ethics commission includes it in the body. >> the library in the bod y >> the police commission in the bod y the arts commission and mr. renne at the last hearing we had in february said specifically i think that all city bodies should... >> yes. and i think that we are in agreement on that. but you now just said that the library commission is doing it. so then what is the problem? >> because it is arbitrary, my political free speech cannot be what bureau crat decides, and i will not go before the body that i work for and have them discuss it and make a decision, i will do it...

am not saying that you are right or wrong and as a practical matter, if we went and treated it as against the art commission, how would the procedure be different. in fact, as i look at it, there is less of a burden on you under section two than there is under section three. >> that may be the case, as far as burden goes. but as far as who you are ultimately going to find responsible under this procedure may be you will get the foot shoulder a slap on the wrist and the head of the department goes scott-free because according to this formulation, no department head was involved. and u...