Power Someone News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

cell phone, this is one permitting them to look at the contents of the cell phone. eastman is the one who cooked up the dubious rationale for overturning the election. also cassidy hutchinson, former white house aide to mark meadows, is cooperating with the department of justice. that's according to a source with knowledge of the discussions. and it comes with a caveat. we don't yet know the extent of her cooperation. we're learning, though, that she's not alone. this morning, an acquaintance of hers, alyssa farah griffin, said she is, quote, aware of other white house officials who ...

victory. >> and the short, she referred to their, former pence chief of staff, marc short, who testified before the grand jury, the federal grand jury. greg jacob as well they are on the right of your screen. served as a top lawyer to the former vice president. he also testified. which doesn't confirm the prosecutors are planning to make the former president's campaign to pressure mike pence into doing his bidding part of the case against him, but short and jacob's testimony, also with wet griffin just said, might suggest is, as does the washington post reporting yesterday that feder...

Amendment, which would essentially have sidelined the former president. that amendment is their only for purposes of removing from power someone who can no longer safely exercise it. what was it that led them to think this man was so much out of control that he could no longer be trusted with the presidency? finding out in detail what he said to them, or what he said in their presence, could be invaluable in deciding whether he is a continuing threat, and what his state of mind was leading up to and during the violent insurrection. >> we have learned that federal prosecutors are investigating ...

Potentially sitting for an interview with the select committee. >> it's clear that the select committee is interested in why there was discussion within the cabinet of invoking the 25th amendment, which would essentially have sidelined the former president. that amendment is there only for purposes of removing from power someone who can no longer safely exorcise it. what led them to think that this man was so out of control that he could no longer be trusted with the presidency. finding out in detail what he said to them or what he said in their presence could be invaluable in deciding whether...

Senate and they say, senator, i hear you, it was bad, he shouldn't have done it. it's wrong, i don't like they denied it and i don't like a lot of things about it but to nullify an election, the founding fathers wanted this to be such an overwhelming and flagrant wrong that two out of three of us saw it the same way and i don't think it's worth nullifying an election with an election right around the corner. it was bad but ukraine's okay, we didn't compromise their efforts versus russia, in fact we gave them arms we hadn't given them in the last administration and they got the aid and we expos...