There's a formula for effectively explaining caselaw
There's a formula for effectively explaining caselaw Photo of Bryan Garner by Winn Fuqua Photography Legal writers are constantly called on to explain things: how an invention works, how a statute’s wording affects its application, why certain people’s actions do or don’t amount to a conspiracy, why a state statute violates the federal constitution and so on. Among the most difficult and predictably recurrent types of explanation is why a legal precedent bears on a point to be decided. Although every lawyer must be prepared to do this, it’s surprisingly tricky. Just as you know people...