Page 6 - Pre Emption News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

attorney general, an attorney day for your time, i'm sure you know the country and perhaps the world will be watching as you implement this law going forward. we start the 11:00 hour here on the east coast. several important decisions from the united states supreme court today. this headline, the big health care decision will not come until thursday, that will be the final day of this year's supreme court term, including the charge of the president's signature first term initiative, also called obama care. but a most important verdict in the arizona immigration case, several provisio...

Requirement that all immigrants obtain or carry immigration registration papers which was a great offense to a lot of people, this notion of having to carry around your papers, and a provision making it a state criminal offense for legal immigrants to seek, work or hold i job. have you the governor of the state and the governors of many other states watching this and who say that the onus should have been on the federal government and they were forced to put this patchwork together like it or not. >> that's exactly not the case what governor brewer is saying. what unfortunately got lost in the...

Made a decision that is other than what ben stein would have decided. so clearly it must be wrong. >> i didn't say it was wrong. i just said it was different from what the next decision's going to be. >> the right wing is always screaming, larry, about we're a nation of laws. we're a nation of laws. well, guess what? we're a nation of laws. and this is unconstitutional -- >> larry: but they disagree with it -- >> that's my point, judges don't make laws. and have them -- >> you cannot have a patchwork quilt. you have to have comprehensive immigration reform. >> the next judge will say we can ha...

Trouble. aisha, what do you think? >> i think there are three points to make here. first of all, is if you are a strict constructionalist, which most conservatives are, this was a constructionalist decision. it was based on constitutional principles of pre-emption and the state stepping in an area that is not their jurisdiction legally. that's the first thing. the second thing is the reason the government sued on those grounds is that's all they needed to sue on. they didn't need to sue secondarily on grounds of discrimination. even if that would have been the effect of the law. all they neede...

Judge will likely show they are prohibited by law. that means they shouldn't enforce the policy because the feds do that even though they don't do that. more accurately, she blocks some provisions because of field pre pre emion meaning the state needs to stay out of it. >> even though she said that was -- she wasn't into pre pre emion a week ago? >> yeah, people taste change. sometime you are not into pre-emption. and then next thing you know it is great. >> it was a fake. she is trying to fake everybody out. but she was going to do what holder tolder to do. >> holder didn't tell her to do it....