Page 2 - Pre Precedent News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Considered briefly for the supreme court a few years ago says there's a notion of a super precedent. that even a conservative judge who disagreed with roe might decide to confirm it because it's been reaffirmed. that's really the central question in these hearings. not only for roe but also for afirmtive action and the death penalty and all the cases where justice kennedy was with the liberals. it's very hard to tease out what a nominee thinks about this issue. susan collins' concern suggests there maybe will be real concerns and that's going to be the central focus of the hearings. >> writ la...

Years of judges who have sworn in their confirmation hearings to respect precedent and then reversed their stand once on the court. for example, in his confirmation hearings, then judge gorsuch said, quote, precedent is like our shared family history of judges, it deserves our respect, unquote. last week, just last week, now justice gorsuch voted to overturn 41 years of precedent in the janis decision, relying on flimsy and fabricated legal theory. it was so flimsy, in fact, that judge kagen wrote in dissent that the majority overruled precedent, quote, for not spepgsal or special reason, beca...

Court casually said, this pre precedent, it's been like 40 year, we're undoing it. so, we're seeing that while calls of judicial activism usually lands on the left, that that's what they do, we're seeing that on the right in realtime right now. how big a deal is this for your state and your function as the top law enforcement officer there? >> crucial. because so many of the challenges that we face, we can take on at the courts. and if we don't have fair play in the courts, then california could lose, if california loses, because we are the most dynamic of the states, the economic engine for t...

Nature and inherent evil. he compared it to beast ality. he was removed twice as chief justice of the alabama supreme court for ignoring legal pre precedent. o we interviewed moore in 2015 when he first became el vanity in recent years because of his saying that his god comes first. >> times change, definitions change. >> our rights do not come from the constitution. they come from law. >> our laws do not come from

Pre precedent. they are asking for a ban. what they are saying is this substantially impairs and diminishes use of the property. detrime detrimental to public held, morals, comfort, the general welfare. their property rights are unique and irreplaceable. there's gross negligence. >> how have these companies like exxon mobile and others reacted when those kinds of cases have been made in court before? >> 100% denial. we're talking about hundreds of millions of dollars spent to discredit the reporting and the "new york times," thousands of news stories on this. 15 million americans live within o...