Page 4 - Privacy Properties News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Total awe and amazement, two tourists, i believe a couple speaking german, were starting to come down the stairs from the top and noticed the coyote and stopped dead in their tracks and they gripped each others arms when they realized what they were seeing and there were tears in their ayes. All four of us, including the coyote just stood there in a silence i can only describe as sacred or spiritual. I am an ordained Roman Catholic deacon, and i know a holy moment when i experience it. And then the coyote vanished back in the thicket on that contested land. I would say this wondrous incident c...

Zoning administrator. For you . It was security and privacy. Now its more of a apln eakg on the behalf of 25 people. That it should be on the 7minute component and 3minute rebuttal. If the people that are here speaking for the appellant would state they are part of that briefing creation and they do not get additional time from Public Statement standpoint. Would that be correct . If thats correct, they are not officially aligned with the appellant. He mentioned in his brief that it was complying with 12 people and he mentioned today there is 25 and who are those 12 people. They effectively wro...

Intended. Okay. Thank you. Mr. Sanchez . I have one question. The appellant is speaking on behalf of 25 people. That it should be on the 7minute component and 3minute rebuttal. If the people that are here speaking for the appellant would state they are part of that briefing creation and they do not get additional time from Public Statement standpoint. Would that be correct . If thats correct, they are not officially aligned with the appellant. He mentioned in his brief that it was complying with 12 people and he mentioned today there is 25 and who are those 12 people. They effectively wrote th...

Okay. I cant answer your question. Sure. I just asked. Got it. Thank you. Not right now. Thank you. Scott sanchez, planning department. I believe the project sponsor has compelling arguments, in our decision letter. I would like to go back to the subject property 272 Upper Terrace in our zoning district. At this rear property we have Mount Olympus and there is a public sidewalk at the rear Property Line essentially of the subject property. In june 2013, they did seek a Building Permit to build a fence that is taller than is there now. It was approved by the staff. We received complaints from t...

Evaluated differently. In summary our fence has no impact in the enjoyment of the park with sidewalks surrounding it and properties throughout the neighborhood are detrimental to deny us the right of any meaningful height constitutes hardship and we would say they are incorrect. If you are on the sidewalk and seeing your fence, your time is up. So, and your fence is up already, you are walking in that sidewalk that its not otherwise impeded the public view . Correct. This is the view where the fence is now. It will go where my finger is. It will drop down to about there based on the variance. ...