Page 14 - Property Condition News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Emily aaron quinn, permit to alter a building new onestory addition at front of building with new terrace at 2nd floor; renovation of 1st floor bathroom; renovation of exterior landscaping, stairs and entry; no changes to north and west elevations . Application no. 2012 02 23 4735. For hearing today good morning my name is inaudible and i represent peters who live in the property adjacent and i want to express the support of the project because it will be a terrific improvement to the property and this neighborhood. It is 6 feet above the grade of mr. Peters property and supported by the regio...

A statement of overriding considerations and the adoption of a mitigation and monitoring and recording program, the materials and testimony presented and available to this board for this hearing and the board finds that there is no new information of substantial importance to the projector changes or circumstances of the project is undertaken and including the reduction and height of the project that will change the conclusions of the Planning Commission in certifying the eir or such determination in such a way to require the additional review under the california quality act. The said record ...

Voted for the project to move forward, thank you. Thank you. Any other Public Comment . Okay, seeing none, we will open rebuttal and you have three minutes. Thank you, members of the board. The primary point that i want to make is that my clients dont oppose the mexican mu museum and it is an interesting strategy for the developer to align with a worthy cause with the museum because the developer can stay in the background while the eloquent and worthy allies of the development make the case for the developer. But lets not forget that the developer stands to make at least 120,000 million by hi...

Addressed mr. Peters questions regarding the impact of the project on his retaining Foundation Wall. It outlines the project and does not address the reviews of mr. Peters retaining wall and foundation. And in fact, the plan was engineered without reviewing this retaining wall which is visible only from mr. Peters garage. And i have a picture of the wall. That is the wall and that goes on top. That way . Okay. Mr. Peters wants the permit application to reflect the impact that does not retaining wall is going to sustain from the amount and the effect of the additional load that is going to be c...

Elevations . Application no. 2012 02 23 4735. For hearing today good morning my name is inaudible and i represent peters who live in the property adjacent and i want to express the support of the project because it will be a terrific improvement to the property and this neighborhood. It is 6 feet above the grade of mr. Peters property and supported by the region that runs along the Northern Property line of mr. Peters property. Mr. Peters filed this appeal because he knew that the building and the department and the supplying department and all of the permit holders have addressed mr. Peters q...