Stay updated with breaking news from Pruesident trump. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Transcripts for CNN CNN Newsroom With Fredricka Whitfield 20191214 16:29:15 archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Vindman has in common with michael cohen expect they describe the power dynamic in very much the same way. that a request, a requirement is all but a direct order when comes from donald trump. he used this verb demand and several times. i think it was right in using it because he talked about the power differential between someone like the president of ukraine and frankly, any other world leader across the globe and pruesident trump. not because he s president trump, but because he s the president of the united states and with that comes all of the authority, all the signalling. visa vee russia and our adversaries and a country like ukraine needs and crucially, american taxpayer dollars. it was in the form of military stance. in this case, advantaging him in ....
Hundreds of hours of testimony. thousands of questions asked. thousands of answers given. the number of times that witnesses have been asked any question about whether or not president trump s conduct constituted bribery before ambassador yovanovitch was asked by congressman stewart last thursday is zero. zero. now that s really interesting. it s kind of a lawyer s trick. let s discuss. he had two visual aids. one, that dramatic stack of transcripts saying they weren t discussing legal term bribery and two, full disclosure over his shoulder at times view uers might see, he had a visual aid that referred to actual msnbc reporting about bribery and the constitution. what is he doing there? he s trying to make it sound suspicious that these fact witnesses weren t discussing law. of course the reason why you have fact and legal witnesses is the fact witnesses discuss what they saw. they don t issue, they re not supposed to issue legal ....
To determine whether a sitting president should be impeached. that that is really way beyond any normal policy position. that s a statement that is countererred to what the constitution says and the last thing i ll say about this that s so important on the trial its f itself, i hope senator mccaskill is right. i think there s a real possibility that the presiding officer, which will be the chief justice of the supreme court, will work very hard to be apolitical and that really means the senate is going to make a lot of the decisions about evidence. four lawyers take control to school. thank you all of you. we are going to sneak in a break. we are waiting for the afternoon session of the public testimony today in donald trump s impeachment proceedings. coming up this afternoon, two political appointees, both of whom have testified to the quid pro quo that donald trump and his allies at one time denied. is it true that president trump directed the eukrainian ....
Steamrolled because she ran afoul of it. today we heard from two firsthand fact witnesses that spoke about the finer points of that phone call in question and now the inquiry is closer to president trump because you have tim morrison who was the top russia adviser on the nsc and kurt volcker alleged to work with rudy giuliani and with rick perry to get the ukrainians to do the thing that president trump demanned of them. kurt volcker is second witness to amend his testimony, the first was gordon sondland who added three pages of revised testimony before the transcript of the deposition was released. are there any questions of the credibility of mr. volcker s testimony today? reporter: i think republicans will seize on that, nicole, if he offers up information that s in some way not helpful to the republican case or directly damaging to president trump. i think the question you ll hear from republicans is do we believe you then or now. ....