publishing arm of russians for their hacking materials. why all the lies about these contacts and the indictment charges, roger stone, with several eyes before our committee. efforts to intimidate and prevent other witnesses to tell the truth. why go to all that trouble as to roger stone it does not add up. congressman schiff, it seems that there is such a gap between the president and his intel chiefs. does that play into questions that you would have in the committee. i have never seen anything like this. have we ever before? i don t think we have seen anything like this. we are going to be doing deep dives into many of the issues that were raised in the testimony yesterday. the contradictions between our intelligence agency, what they
intelligence committee and some of these charges, of course, relate to roger stone s testimony to your committee. your immediate reaction to all of this today? well, my immediate reaction is that very paragraph that you re focused on, which is that someone directed a senior campaign official to reach out to stone, to find out about future releases. how many people could direct a senior campaign official? and that language of direction we ve seen in other indictments before, referring to individual 1 directing the campaign finance fraud scheme, for example. so there s probably a very select number of people that are in a position to do that. and also, the chronology of all this, that you have these private efforts to find out about these stolen e-mails and the publishing arm of the russians, which is wikileaks, as well as guccifer 2, at the same
president s role was, what the role was of people around him, and that s our mission. and i m not going to ask you to speculate, but do you have any idea who the campaign official was who was supposedly ordered to give stone orders, to get more information from wikileaks? well, you know, i don t want to go into both the evidence that we have as well as our suspicions about who played various roles. there have been already public accounts of some of the e-mails and who might have been on the other end of some of these e-mails. but it s clear that some of the witnesses came in before our committee and refused to answer questions, they re going to have to come back, and this time we ll have the power of the subpoena to compel them to answer questions. others that we wanted to bring before the committee but the majority refused, we will be bringing, so that we understand the full nature of the contact that the campaign and those associated with it had with this publishing arm of the kr
check in with steven chadwick. can he make this three days in a row. this will go well for the payroll figure. at the end of the week. in terms of valuations, the p ratio of valuation, we re cheaper than we were back in 2007. time warner could be putting time into a separate unit. the publishing arm that has the fortune and time brand, has been struggling as of late. last year made less money. $420 million at an operating income level. than a decade ago. very interesting story in the
although the perpetrator of this evil act has received a lot of attention over the last couple of days, that attention will fade away. and in the end, after he has felt the full force of our justice system, what will be remembered are the good people who are impacted by this tragedy. we re exploring this tragedy in depth this morning. we ll hear from survivors of the shooting and also going to hear from the mayor of aurora, a clinical psychologist, and former fbi agent and speak exclusively with a man who was a camp counselor with holmes. we begin with an interview with two young women, micayla hicks and lori shaffer, next to where the gunman open fire, a bullet passed through the wall and struck micayla right in the chin. lori was sitting next to micayla. how does your chin feel? it hurts pretty bad in my gums, bottom gums got pushed back by the bullet and one oth was knocked out and luckily caught it in my hand. the tooth next to the bottom front got moved around an