"Partly Constitutional" Doesn't Cut It
“Partly Constitutional” Doesn’t Cut It SHARE The oddest defense of S.1/H.R. 1 I’ve seen lately is that the courts would ultimately uphold parts of it as constitutional. As several backers told the New York Times in a roundup article last week on expected legal challenges, “not all of the anticipated challenges to [the omnibus election bill] would succeed.” Many parts would be left standing. I’ve got a new piece at National Review pointing out that a standard of “partly constitutional, partly not” shouldn’t be seen as good enough. “Members of Congress take an o...
Source: cato.org