Live Breaking News & Updates on Questionable Construction Adjudication Decision Against You

To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
It is well known that a security of payment adjudication decision can be challenged in Court for jurisdictional error. This article looks at what needs to be proven in order to prevent an adjudication decision being enforced before the Court makes its determination.
The recent Supreme Court decision in 
Karam Group Pty Ltd v Earthmoving Contractors Pty Ltd deals with the common circumstance where an interim injunction is sought while an alleged jurisdictional error of an adjudicator is determined by the Court. The case deals with whether or not recent views of the High Court preclude an injunction so that money would flow regardless, leaving a respondent to bear the risk of non-repayment should it ultimately be successful in its challenge of the decision. ....

Justice Brown , Karam Group Pty Ltd , Modular Pty Ltd , Earthmoving Contractors Pty Ltd , District Court , Supreme Court , Constructions Pty Ltd Ors , Queensland Supreme Court , High Court , Building Industry Fairness , Contractors Pty Ltd , Honour Justice Brown , Probuild Constructions , Pty Ltd , Shade Systems Pty Ltd , Justice Bond , Questionable Construction Adjudication Decision Against You , Mediation Amp Arbitration , Trials Amp Appeals Compensation , Real Estate And Construction , Construction Amp Planning , நீதி பழுப்பு , கரம் குழு ப்டி லிமிடெட் , மட்டு ப்டி லிமிடெட் , மண் நகரும் ஒப்பந்தக்காரர்கள் ப்டி லிமிடெட் , மாவட்டம் நீதிமன்றம் ,