On our 40 years of precedent. she also asked, so what's left? i want to pose that question to you. what is left of the voting rights act if alabama ultimately prevails here in, i should note, a very conservative supreme court? >> what alabama is essentially arguing is that the voting rights act only prohibits intentional discrimination. even worse, alabama is saying that any time you use race and redistricting, that that itself is potentially unconstitutional. if alabama prevails on those arguments, then it would make it much more difficult for any state, city council, school board, to draw ma...