Live Breaking News & Updates on Rhetorical question

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from Rhetorical question on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in Rhetorical question and stay connected to the pulse of your community

Ayman

through to get kavanaugh on the bench. what is the strategy there? why are you talking about what you did to get supreme court justices seated before they are going to hear the case that will ultimately determine your future. what am i missing? >> is that a rhetorical question. you know the answer. he's probably talking about kavanaugh as if to say, hey, i helped you out, no help me out. at least that is what people are going to be saying about anything to donald trump says about the supreme court justices that he had the responsibility for placing on the bench. >> is it smart? >> it's not smart. look, it is not smart to talk about federal judges at all when you have a pending case. i'm trying to put on my trump rationale hat for a moment. in his mind, he thinks that whether or not they are public about, it they probably think that they owe him something for getting on to the bench. i don't know, in trump land, that makes sense. it does not make sense to a court that is so committed to

Case , United-states-supreme-court , Justices , Bench , Kavanaugh , Strategy , Future , Donald-trump , People , Anything , Least , Answer

Ayman

and levels, let's go high. in fact, let's go to the highest of the high. we do not believe, and i tend to agree with you, that donald trump is going to have as much rhetoric around his d.c. court of appeals case. but now we have the supreme court involved. we have the supreme court involved, potentially around the 14th amendment. we have heard whispers, and some rhetoric publicly, to his followers for the most part, about the fight that he went through to get kavanaugh on the bench. what is the strategy there? why are you talking about what you did to get supreme court justices seated before they are going to hear a case that will ultimately determine your future? what am i missing? >> is that a rhetorical question. you know the answer. he's probably talking about kavanaugh as if to say, hey, i helped you out, now help me out. at least that is what people are going to be saying about anything donald trump says about the supreme court justices that he had the responsibility for placing on the bench. >> is it smart?

Donald-trump , Supreme-court , Case , Rhetoric , Fact , D-c- , Levels , Highest , Let-s-go-high , Court-of-appeals , High , Fight

FOX and Friends Saturday

obesity medicine and insulin. you'll be speaking to a healthcare provider and it's not that they're going to send you free medicines. will: not much time left and that's okay. this feels like a rhetorical question. does dry january improve your health? i'm not a doctor but i can tell you that one, yes. >> i don't think we should have where you drink and binge all yearlong then say i'm going to cut down for 30 days. we should be careful and consider moderation throughout the year. but absolutely if you can engage in dry january, you're giving your liver a break, a breather and your liver will break down that alcohol and in turn you'll improve your blood pressure and reduce risk of addiction and accidents and cancers and on top of that, you'll lose weight and save money. will: super bowl is in february now; right? >> we can do this. we can do this. >> which team will make it though? will: coming up, biden might love the evs but looks like americans disagree and more on

Will , Left , Medicine , Medicines , Healthcare-provider , Insulin , Rhetorical-question , Obesity , Doctor , Health , Moderation , Yes

Deadline White House

likely to backfire. i want to endorse all of the always wise things that andrew said, but i want to make sure we don't lose the forest for the trees here, which is that whatever the court does in the details or on the merits, take stock of the fact we are having a national debate of whether one of the likely nominees for a major party for the president engaged in insurrection against the united states. regardless of the law, shouldn't that be just politically disqualifying for either party? don't both parties want someone without a question as to whether or not they engaged in insurrection? >> a rhetorical question we could spend 15 minutes answin to the point of not losing the akes or the context, i want to read you something from "the new york times." "what unites trump with the former secessionists under the disqualification clause is, like

Colorado-supreme-court , All-of-the-above , Things , Forest-for-the-trees , Merits , Details , Joe-biden , Fact , Republican , Debate , Nominees , Stock

Invincible's Last Line Redefines the Meaning of Omni-Man's "Think, Mark!" Speech

Invincible's Last Line Redefines the Meaning of Omni-Man's "Think, Mark!" Speech
screenrant.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from screenrant.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.

Mark-grayson , Robert-kirkman-invincibleended , Robert-kirkman , Final-triumph-comes-in-answering , Rhetorical-question , Viltrumite-empire ,

Alex Witt Reports

everyone? >> there is not a lot of common sense coming from the republican party right now. we should be talking about this. we should be talking about a.i.. we should be talking about mental health. we should be talking about limitations on gun purchases. we should be talking about how antiquated the second amendment does. we are not in the majority, and republicans are too afraid, or they are being held hostage by the extreme, and they are not willing to talk about this. remember, i sit on a committee that and the very beginning, voted to allow us to bring guns and explosives to the committee. the republicans said that this was okay. so how do you think we're going to have common sense on the floor when it comes to protecting the lives of americans that were trying to go grocery shopping, or go to church, or go to school. >> and fortunately, that's a rhetorical question. one could always have hope.

Lot , Everyone , Gop , Common-sense , A-i- , Mental-health , Limitations , Amendment , Hostage , Gun-purchases , Majority , Guns

The 11th Hour With Stephanie Ruhle

that the rule of the strong always wins. the question is, can those who would follow donald trump to the edge of the cliff and a heck of a lot of folks who would fall off the cliff, are they willing to put an allegiance to the constitution ahead of their allegiance to him or a partisan victory? that is a big question. >> perhaps, to answer what is in some ways a rhetorical question, you have trump as the gop front runner. he's facing 91 criminal counts and the four indictments, and the reaction from some republican voters is a shrug. the reaction from most republican leaders is a shrug. what does that tell you about that sense of shame not just on the part of donald trump, but the idea that the shame would need to be shared, the idea that responsibility would need to be shared. >> it's a particularly gloomy moment. the way the constitution is set up, we need two functioning parties that are basically loyal to the constitution. we need two parties that will

Everything-donald-trump , Question , Lot , Folks , Allegiance , Constitution , The-big-question , Victory , Rule , Wins , Cliff , Heck

Jesse Watters Primetime

bribery allegations, the wire transfers come from all over the world, for nothing, for now reason and that you have a massive cover-up, what does that tell you, the fact that this is happening and he is trying to prosecute directly your father? >> eric: can you imagine that was me? barbara mika haley biden is receiving money from romania and china, these other countries? i mean, what product do they sell? that is what i say. you know what business we are in. we have been in the hotel's business for the last 30 years. what product do they sell? that is a rhetorical question. everybody knows the answer to that. and they don't do a damn thing about it. this kid had top-secret documents. my father is the one being charged all while doing, you know, the president -- prostitution and illicit drugs and father is what being charged. >> jesse: everyone sees it and if they don't see it, they are going to see it. if this trial goes down before

Father , Fact , Nothing , Bribery-allegations , Transfers , Cover-up , All-over-the-world , Eric , Business , China , Product , Countries

Jesse Watters Primetime

out about joe biden, the bribe allegations, the wire transfers from all over the world for nothing, for no reason, and then you have a massive coverup, what does that tellhapn you, the fact that this is happening and he's trying to prosecute directly your father. can you imagine? that was me. eric: ci mean, haley biden isba receiving money from romania and chinrbara a and these othern countries. i mean, what product do they sell? that's what i always say. you know what a business we're in. we've been in the hotel business for the last 30 years. we sell real estate. we'row wha e tee in golf.l' l you know, what product do they sell? and everybody. that's a rhetorical question seo everybody knows the answer to that, you know, and they don't do a thing about itand t i mean, this kid was out there literally living in his father's house, had top secrett documents behind the corvette. yents.t my father is the one ber charged all while doing, you knowge, and illicit drugs. yet my father is a guy being charged. >> and tell me it's gross. absolutely unbelievable. ieverybody sees it. and if they don't see it, they're going to see it because thereryone se will be an impeac. and if this trial actually goes

Joe-biden , Fact , Reaso-n , Nothing , All-over-the-world , Transfers , Bribe-allegations , Coverup , Tellhapn-you , Father , Business , Money

NBC Nightly News With Lester Holt

2024. the statement answers their own rhetorical question, saying this is an act of election interference, echoing something we've heard repeat from mr. trail. on the campa now reaction is stil ming in from republican elected officials arouhe country. prest's defense r witatements preprepared for this moment. most of his other campaign rivals so far still silent. his top rival ron desantis out with a statement saying he has not read the indictment, but suggests there is political prosecution at work here, something that he would end should he be president. lester? >> garrett haake, thank you. laura jarrett back with me as well as chief justice contributor jonathan dienst. if you step back, this is astonishing what we witnessed over the last several weeks. can we talk about the confirmation of these unindicted co-conspirators and why they would not be named or indicted a this point? >> well, it's possible that the special counsel's office is still gathering information on some of them. we're working to

Leging , Statement , Something , Election-interference , Campa , Act , Repeat , Trail , Rhetorical-question , 2024 , Reaction , Most