Page 23 - Rights Problem News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Good morning. Push the microphone down. Over to the left some. Ok, good morning. And judge gould. Sittingleasure to be here with my colleagues, judge hawkins my rights, another judge of my left. All of us extend the welcome to the distinguished lawyers here to argue their cases. Also, to her serve observers. Number 14, three 5958, is submitted on briefs also the calvert case, number 15 35 465, is submitted on briefs. The first case for oral arguments today is the state of hawaii versus trump. Thats 17 15589. That case is set for 30 minutes per side. Please watch your time and try to sum up whe...

Youll hear argument first this morning in case 151194, packingham versus North Carolina. Mr. Goldberg. Mr. Chief justice, may it please the court, there are three principal features of North Carolinas law that make it a stark abridgement of the freedom of speech. First, section 2, 2. 5, reaches vast swaths of core First Amendment activity that is totally unrelated to the governments preventive purpose. Mr. Packingham was not accused of communicating with or viewing the profile of a minor. He violated section 202. 5 by speaking to his friends and family about his experience in traffic court. An...

Youll hear argument first this morning in case 151194, packingham versus North Carolina. Mr. Goldberg. Mr. Chief justice, may it please the court, there are three principal features of North Carolinas law that make it a stark abridgement of the freedom of speech. First, section 2, 2. 5, reaches vast swaths of core First Amendment activity that is totally unrelated to the governments preventive purpose. Mr. Packingham was not accused of communicating with or viewing the profile of a minor. He violated section 202. 5 by speaking to his friends and family about his experience in traffic court. An...

Its antithetical for the government to decide what speech is acceptable. When the police in charlottesville declined to impose order, they allows the hecklers veto to silence speech. And its unconstitutional. Its the functional equivalent of government taking sides and censoring the speech it hates or fears. The remedy is not to silence or censor it. The remedy is more speech to challenge the hatred, speech to educate the haters. Speech to expose their moral vacuity. The american promise of the right to pursue happiness is only as good as those in government who protect it and in charlottesvil...

Its antithetical for the government to decide what speech is acceptable. When the police in charlottesville declined to impose order, they allows the hecklers veto to silence speech. And its unconstitutional. Its the functional equivalent of government taking sides and censoring the speech it hates or fears. The remedy is not to silence or censor it. The remedy is more speech to challenge the hatred, speech to educate the haters. Speech to expose their moral vacuity. The american promise of the right to pursue happiness is only as good as those in government who protect it and in charlottesvil...