Stay updated with breaking news from Role out. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
This weekend we interviewed lieutenant governor dan patrick and attorney general ken paxton saying the following. the reason that texas and the governor will ship illegal immigrants to washington, d.c. is yes, because it is symbolically the right thing to do. legislators and the administration should see and live with the impact of their own policies to tell you how many diners have told me that traveled this country. send illegal immigrants to washington, d.c. more importantly what both of them said is force a constitutional challenge. if you will not enforce our laws, then we will and if you tell us in this case the state of texas that we cannot, let s take it to the supreme court. that s the purpose of this act. it is not simply symbolic or not a publicity grab it is the force the constitutional challenge. harris: i wonder how it will role out. when the lieutenant governor says 20% of all americans will be illegal immigrants i want to put a fine point on. ....
Which i am thrilled about. i think the role out was run mostly by the nhs and gp surgeries, and i don t know quite what has happened there. i m being called by my gp and was for my previous jabs. there s a sort of falling off of take up, i think. i think people have become complacent and there s a weird kind of split in the country which is the same as or more related to a split we have had a long time over many issues. there is, on the one hand a sort of loss of trust in the government which has changed tact many times during this pandemic. we had the prime minister saying let the bodies pile up which has itself been very complacent and at odds with itself about how to proceed. and on the other side there s this kind of cavalier defiance like, i m ok, it s not going to be a problem. so if you take the tube in london these days fewer than half the people on the tube are wearing a face covering. ....
Security into account. which is what he did. lawrence: that s the legal argument. kennedy: i want to pivot in a slightly different direction. you look at a decision like this and the influence that the court is going to have for a long time. and with neil gorsuch taking his place on the court and it looks as though the president is going to have at least one, maybe two more picks, it goes to show you that there is a lot of foment and rhetoric and possibly intent. but that doesn t meet the threshold for the confines of a legal document. i think the president s legal team knows that. the first role out was botched. no doubt about that. what the president did is he went back with his team and narrowed the confines to make it through the sort of judicial scrutiny. now we are seeing there may be something else in the works other than the president s impulsivity and love for social media. ....
But to the organization. take the role out, now you have a president who fired out his fbi director? that s right, i think capitol hill is capitol hill and there s plenty of hypocrisy and plenty of democrats who are using the termination as a as a sledgehammer to beat the administration, and my hope is that somehow, the democrats can be satisfied with a nominee, with a candidate for this position that they would get broad consensus into backing. you know, is that a john cornyn? a mike rogers who had an r behind their names? i have a doubt about that. my hope is not just a very broad and strong consensus. not 51 votes on the hill but 95 votes. because i think the country needs to embrace this next fbi director well. bret: you know, there s a number of names out there and catherine went over some of them, one not in the piece was ....
take the role out, now you have a president who fired out his fbi director? that s right, i think capitol hill is capitol hill and there s plenty of hypocrisy and plenty of democrats who are using the termination as a as a sledgehammer to beat the administration, and my hope is that somehow, the democrats can be satisfied with a nominee, with a candidate for this position that they would get broad consensus into backing. you know, is that a john cornyn? a mike rogers who had an r behind their names? i have a doubt about that. my hope is not just a very broad and strong consensus. not 51 votes on the hill but 95 votes. because i think the country needs to embrace this next fbi director as well. bret: you know, there s a number of names out there and catherine went over some of them, one not in the piece was merrick ....