Olestra Fat-Free Snack Controversy of the 1990s
After decades of development and $200 million spent, Procter & Gamble thought they had the perfect snack food additive with olestra. Too bad it caused “rectal urgency.”
Source: mentalfloss.com
Stay updated with breaking news from Ruffles Light. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
After decades of development and $200 million spent, Procter & Gamble thought they had the perfect snack food additive with olestra. Too bad it caused “rectal urgency.”