Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20170515:17:15:00
Argue is the purpose of the statute as opposed to its language? >> no. i wouldn't say necessarily the purpose. i think that immigration law has always as the supreme court said you always have to look to relevant factors and understand what does congress deem relevant and what not? i think when you ask yourself that question nationality is now no longer such a factor. this saz transformational statute in 1965 passed with the voting rights act. that is why. that's on the 1152 argument. i don't want the court to lose sight of the 1182 which looks like it is a broad statute but it does ultimately...
Source: news source