Page 2 - Scheme Group News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Stay updated with breaking news from Scheme group. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.

Top News In Scheme Group Today - Breaking & Trending Today

CSPAN3 Key Capitol Hill Hearings November 28, 2016

When you say we are talking about a remedy not in terms of finding a violation. Dont say you are implementing congresss intent when you look at what a congress 60 years later would do. When you are rendering a gender discriminatory statute by leveling up or down you are not using congresss intent. But you will ask what would they have wanted if they knew they couldnt make this discrimination. I thought if you have to go back to 52, they are going to either have to take the benefit away from the woman or give it to the man. They hate that. They get into trouble when they take benefits away. That moves them in one direction and also moves them in the same direction if there are a handful of men who might benefit. If there were millions of men who might benefit they might get worried about what they are doing particularly since they are discriminating more against the married couple. I was interested in those questions, but i take it you have said what you can say on that. All you can say ....

New York , United States , North Carolina , Beverly Hills , Northern District , Pulau Pinang , Eastern District , Ash Sharqiyah , Saudi Arabia , Equatorial Guinea , Sidley Austin , Roger Fairfax , Michael Jackson , Sally Yates , Karen Popp , Leslie Caldwell , Look Congress , Years Later , Justice Ginsburgs , Court Appeals , Life United States , Father Child , Requirements Congress , Children World , Just Words , Never Get ,

CSPAN3 Key Capitol Hill Hearings November 28, 2016

When you say we are talking about a remedy not in terms of finding a violation. Dont say you are implementing congresss intent when you look at what a congress 60 years later would do. When you are rendering a gender discriminatory statute by leveling up or down you are not using congresss intent. But you will ask what would they have wanted if they knew they couldnt make this discrimination. I thought if you have to go back to 52, they are going to either have to take the benefit away from the woman or give it to the man. They hate that. They get into trouble when they take benefits away. That moves them in one direction and also moves them in the same direction if there are a handful of men who might benefit. If there were millions of men who might benefit they might get worried about what they are doing particularly since they are discriminating more against the married couple. I was interested in those questions, but i take it you have said what you can say on that. All you can say ....

New York , United States , North Carolina , Beverly Hills , Northern District , Pulau Pinang , Eastern District , Ash Sharqiyah , Saudi Arabia , Equatorial Guinea , Sidley Austin , Roger Fairfax , Michael Jackson , Sally Yates , Karen Popp , Leslie Caldwell , Look Congress , Years Later , Justice Ginsburgs , Court Appeals , Life United States , Father Child , Requirements Congress , Children World , Just Words , Never Get ,

CSPAN3 Key Capitol Hill Hearings November 28, 2016

When you say we are talking about a remedy not in terms of finding a violation. Dont say you are implementing congresss intent when you look at what a congress 60 years later would do. When you are rendering a gender discriminatory statute by leveling up or down you are not using congresss intent. But you will ask what would they have wanted if they knew they couldnt make this discrimination. I thought if you have to go back to 52, they are going to either have to take the benefit away from the woman or give it to the man. They hate that. They get into trouble when they take benefits away. That moves them in one direction and also moves them in the same direction if there are a handful of men who might benefit. If there were millions of men who might benefit they might get worried about what they are doing particularly since they are discriminating more against the married couple. I was interested in those questions, but i take it you have said what you can say on that. All you can say ....

New York , United States , North Carolina , Beverly Hills , Northern District , Pulau Pinang , Eastern District , Ash Sharqiyah , Saudi Arabia , Equatorial Guinea , Sidley Austin , Roger Fairfax , Michael Jackson , Sally Yates , Karen Popp , Leslie Caldwell , Look Congress , Years Later , Justice Ginsburgs , Court Appeals , Life United States , Father Child , Requirements Congress , Children World , Just Words , Never Get ,