Page 10 - Second Question First News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Selection part. but once they start the jury selection part, that should go pretty quickly and then we'll get to opening statements. and the government has said that they have just basically two, maybe three witnesses. an fbi agent who will discuss what he found in his investigation about how the subpoena was delivered, how bannon responded, and then the committee's chief counsel who will describe her interactions with bannon's lawyers and what she said was one nonoig's refusal to comply with the subpoena. and then maybe another counsel from the committee. soness would the government gets star...

>> i'll take the second question first, but the turkey thing we don't know what role president biden. they wanted the guarantees in writing about the kurds from finland and switzerland on that. president biden given erdogan that yesterday may have something to do with it. the agreement to buy f-16s, upgrade its military. those things could be factors, but we have not heard confirmation. the white house has shied away from taking credit from this. as far as the kremlin, we're seeing rumblings from vladimir putin about the nato expansion, basically saying if nato puts more battle grooups along t...

The justice department said it will end the ruling of a mask mandate on public transportation. elizabeth, as we wait to hear from the cdc as to whether or not they would pursue further legal action, should people continue to wear masks when they travel, and is there any sense of when and if the cdc may weigh in? >> bianna, i'm going to take that second question first. we don't have a timeline from the cdc, but they have given us an idea of the factors that they're considering on whether or not they will be recommending that people still wear masks in planes and other types of transportation. l...

The u.s. military, chuck, to seize voting machines. how significant is it in your mind that they are in conversation with bill barr about this, and what will be they investigating about the military's role in interference? >> yeah, let me take the second question first, alex, if i may. there is a federal statute that prohibits using the military to enforce federal domestic criminal law. there are some exceptions to it, none of which i imagine apply here. and so if the president or those around him, his minions, were really thinking about using the military to enforce federal domestic law, that...

Energy caught on fire. that would put up the radioactive fire that would have contaminated russian troops, floated into russia, parts of europe. clearly they did not know what they were doing then. and i hope someone has read the commanders the riot act and said what are you doing? do not put the plant in danger that is an idiotic move. and not a very welcome sign of confidence within the russian military. arthel: that said though, what about taking over yet another plant and then also tell us what is the imminent danger and the residual security risk involved? >> will start the second questio...