Page 26 - Serious Question News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Of course they will. the president in the "wall street journal" article acted as if he didn't need to address that question or worry about it because obviously there is no collusion, no obstruction of justice. why would he ever be called. the reality is behind the scenes, the president's lawyers are trying to figure out just how much protection they can offer him and just how far he'll have to go, if he'll have to answer questions in person, if mueller's investigators will settle for written answers, which is of course what the president's lawyers would prefer. but i think the real track to wa...

The 25th amendment. the issue here is these are -- those are legal steps. you can't really impeach a president simply because you don't like him, you know, that you disagree with him. so, if there is to be that kind of step forward, it's going to be coming, i suspect, out of the russia investigation. and so it's what don rumsfeld would call at this point a known unknown. >> and, mike, you get the last lightning round question, serious question. how does the gop make that big tent argument now and say, we love you all, come one and come all to our party? >> the president of the united states ha...

It is preeminently a place of moral leadership, that person himself is kind of the chief coursener, if that's a word at the moment. that's beyond -- that's almost a separate question from the legal question. mike mentions impeachment, the 25th amendment. the issue here is these are -- those are legal steps. you can't really impeach a president simply because you don't like him, you know, that you disagree with him. so, if there is to be that kind of step forward, it's going to be coming, i suspect, out of the russia investigation. and so it's what don rumsfeld would call at this point a known ...

Confusion. >> chuck, how do you convince people that warrantless, when they hear that word, doesn't mean reckless? >> good question, brian. warrantless sounds nefarious. >> right. >> but the 4th amendment talks about the need to get a warrant for u.s. persons on u.s. soil to state with particularity, the thing you're looking for and what you expect to find. it precludes unreasonable searches. so, the question really is, is searching or listening to or intercepting the communications of a foreign person on foreign soil for foreign intelligence purposes unreasonable? and the answer overwhelmingl...

So, he used the "a" word and it sent news organizations into panic. how do we deal with this foul language on our air? you've seen the word we're covering tonight and isn't it interesting how times change? >> to paraphrase henry adams, the movement from george h.w. bush to donald trump disproves darwin. i don't really see we're progressing or evolving in the right way. you know, this is a course thing of the culture. what's so remarkable and what we're going to be dealing with for a long time is the fact that the person who in the office of which franklin roosevelt said, it is preeminently a p...