Page 7 - Service Gap News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Definitely want to oppose the approval of this conditional use permit and we are here to support the appeal. I would like to show you the diagram, the subject building is right there and the one next to it is exactly ours. We have seven commercial Stores Currently but it is within the partnership that our intention is to build another 34 story. So we will be creating low housing, commercial store for the area, and my concern is this i understand the safety zone to 32 feet. Can you imagine once we build our building, anywhere from 34 stories, i will make it short. So the safety issue, 32 feet w...

Commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner moore commissioner hillis and commissioner johnson commissioner president wu. Thank you, commissioners due to the late start well be moving things around on the calendar weaning well be moving tatters c and d to the end of the calendar and item 12 for 490 van ness will be outside of order following abc of pine street so commissioners terrors is the items proposed for continuance item one at 53 state street a announced discretionary reviews no other items proposed for continues and i have no speaker cards any Public Comment on the items pro...

City to pretend that airbnb can set up operations with no constraints is taking part in an illegal operation i will definitely urge you to reconsider efforts to authorize them to gather revenues for the city from further operations thank you is there any additional Public Comment seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Commissioners that places you under our and item two came off of content so tame item 2 at 1098 jackson street request for conditional use authorization. Thank you chair and members of the Police Station on september 11, 2014, the Planning Commission heard is request for conditio...

The public that wish to speak on this, lineup on the right hand side of the board chamber. President chiu and supervisors, good afternoon. My name is sophie law and im the Property Owner immediate adjacent to the subject property of 431 balboa street, my property starts as 437 to 439 balboa street. We definitely want to oppose the approval of this conditional use permit and we are here to support the appeal. I would like to show you the diagram, the subject building is right there and the one next to it is exactly ours. We have seven commercial Stores Currently but it is within the partnership...

The subject building is right there and the one next to it is exactly ours. We have seven commercial Stores Currently but it is within the partnership that our intention is to build another 34 story. So we will be creating low housing, commercial store for the area, and my concern is this i understand the safety zone to 32 feet. Can you imagine once we build our building, anywhere from 34 stories, i will make it short. So the safety issue, 32 feet were within that. In another issue is the notification process dh most of the Property Owners never got noticed until i just learned about this last...