Most summaries and studies examine Social Security reform from theviewpoint of federal budget impact, tax rates, and thesurvivability of the system, but few consider the overall impact ofreform on the workers it was designed to benefit. Social Securityshould not be reformed or "saved" for its own sake, but only if itmore effectively provides the benefits workers need at a price theycan afford.
In a June 13 Fox Nation debate, Sen. Lindsey Graham said seniors may have to "take a little less" and "pay a little more in" when debating Social Security solvency, reports Knewz via MSN. Graham made.
slings and arrows of outrageous fortune. he was a class act from birth to death. he housed the strong sinews in mind and body gained from that extraordinary mother. we compared our mothers as velvet hammers, of course, and certainly most awesome fathers. the history books will and are treating him most fairly, while uncovering some other powerful traits, his great competitiveness, his raw courage and his self discipline. recall the andrews air base conclave where congressional participants drafted a remarkable bill that dealt with two-year budgeting, entitlement reform, comprehensive and catastrophic health care, social security solvency and much more,
catastrophic health care, social security solvency and much more, but it required a critical ingredient called revenue. translated into the word taxes. translated into the words read my lips and the group with went to george and said, look, we can get this package done, but we must have some revenue, and he said, i ll never forget it, he said, what i have said on that subject sure puts a hell of a lot of heat on me. and then they all said, yes, but we can get it done, and it will be bipartisan. and george said, okay, go for it. but it will be a real punch in the gut. bob dole then a loyal warrior for george took it back to the senate and we won a strong
dangerous cob sequence we ve seen the consequence of washington not coming up with policy formulations in a pro-active way. we re still discussing social security solvency, which is pathetic. still trike to figure out how to pay for the health care spitelements and they re a collective arrogance on the part of congresswoman pelosi when 50% of northwestern people are saying, please, do something about this. she is not alone. there are knock of prominent democrats, we don t have a spending problem, we have a healthcare problem, and get everything under control. so you can be in denial a long time before you re starting to say it s more than a river in egypt. it s true but at it ultimately an arrogance saying we re the united states of america. we re never going to default, and it becomes ingrained the fabric of our country, so the people start accepting we re just going to keep spending-keep the government services going, the support programs going, and somebody else down the line