Page 39 - Starr Report News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Glass. but the grand jury material was redacted from the report. it would require a court order for that information to be released to congress because grand jury secrecy is a paramount concern. your committee has been asking the justice department to get that kind of an okay from a federal judge. but with this vote tomorrow, the justice department will now be beside the point and you will be able to go to the judge yourself? >> right. remember, in the last recent example of the starr report, ken starr went to court to get permission to release the grand jury testimony, and the day he released...

Go to xfinity.com/moving to get started. in the report constitutes multiple crimes of obstruction of justice. i'm confident that if anyone other than a sitting president committed this conduct, that person would be charged with crimes. >> joining us now is former u.s. attorney and msnbc contributor barbara mcquade who testified today before the house judiciary committee on their first hearing on the mueller investigation. i know it's been a really long day. >> glad to be here. >> lou was it? do you think this is a useful thing? do you think congress can get anywhere by holding hearings like th...

Investigation as well. if you were the relevant committee in congress that's supposed to have that information, undies, pants, then belt. we know that because we saw this exact same pattern happen a week or so ago with the intelligence committee. by statute the intelligence committees are entitled to counterintelligence information and foreign intelligence information that's turned up by the justice department, including in the course of a special counsel investigation. they get that stuff. that's why intelligence committees exist. nevertheless, when mueller's redacted report was released to t...

Aleve. proven better on pain. it's quite striking and startling to me that history is repeating itself, and with a vengeance. that's why i've spoken out. >> the facts contained can that report would be sufficient to prove all of the elements necessary to charge multiple counts of obstruction of justice. >> the conduct described in the report constitutes multiple crimes of obstruction of justice. i'm confident if anyone other than a sitting president committed this conduct, that person would be charged with crimes. >> the hearing was called lessons from the mueller report,

One of the alleged obstructive acts by the president in mueller's report is him directing can it mcfarland to draft a false document saying she can vouch for the fact that president trump never told michael flynn to talk about sanctions. according to the mueller report, mcfarland could vouch for no such thing. nevertheless the president told her to create a false record saying that she could. she didn't ultimately create that false record according to mueller's report. she did, however, create some sort of memorandum for the record. they want that file as well. that's just some of it. the list...