Stat Chutes News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

keeping a lot of this under wraps. the committee just announced a surprise hearing for tomorrow with very few details. it's set to begin at 1:00 and the committee is saying they will present what they're calling recently obtained evidence and saying they'll hear more witness testimony. no word yet on what the evidence is or who may be testifying, not even an indication on how many people will be testifying. but there has been this sense that the committee was getting inundated with new information and it was just last week that the committee remember jamie raskin talked after one of ...

we told him, the group that went over there outlined, you know, my belief in chances for success at this point. my belief was that it was very, very -- 5% to 10% is not a good optimistic outlook. >> the committee then showed how former president trump continued to embrace allegations of fraud, going against his white house lawyers, who told him that accusations were baseless were not substantial enough to make a difference in the election outcome. the justice department even told him there was no there-there as trump kept holding onto wild conspiracies. >> there were so many allegati...

States who are vying to see who can pass more restrictive stat chutes. those issues will certainly come up and the supreme court decides what it wants to hear. maybe it ducks it once or twice. but it just can't permit these things to go on without deciding. and one of the most poignant concedes of the whole opinion is maybe they're out of the business. on the contrary, they are going to be in it and for years, because these fights will be waged beginning at the state level. >> thank you all for your expertise. so what's the next move for the white house? cnn's dana bash is going to sit down ...

Capitol. >> elliot, one line, a bit of what we heard from bill barr, he said if he really believes this stuff. if your audience is the doj and you're trying to convince them to file criminal charges of fraud here, how close can they get by saying, listen, all these rational people told him it wasn't true. is it necessary to prove that he actually believed that he lost the election and was still perpetrating the lie? >> it's not just that they're rational people. these are his legal advisers. there's a quote from richard donahue, the acting deputy attorney general of the justice department that...

Working together. >> you have been saying that. i credit you with saying that first. we have senator gillibrand coming up, just to let our viewers up. you are one of 59 female lawmakers calling for congress to investigate the allegations against president trump. that's easier said than done. here is what chairman of the committee that would do that, trey gowdy said. he's on house oversight and government reform. here's what he says in response to your call for an investigation. allegations brought for now, while serious, do not allege violations of specific criminal stat chutes should be refer...