State Level Laws News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

he was born in 1827, he was a minister in the church, he served as a chaplain for the union army during the american civil war. then in 1870, he was elected by the mississippi legislature to the united states senate believe it or not. the first ever black man stand to either body of congress in our country's history, was him. it is sort of hard to imagine that today, mississippi was the first day to actually send a black man to the, congress but they did. and they did it all the way back in 1870. and then believe it or not, an 1875, they did it again. the mississippi legislator said ...

ironic it is that your -- the justice says when they're nominate and they're going through the confirmation process, they say we don't like to comment on hypothetical cases. and it was watching the opening segment and it was -- like no one is aggrieved, there actually is no case here, but they have no problem making decisions about hypothetical cases if, that, say someone one day was aggrieved. >> that's a great point. they re-found their ability to weigh in on high post. >> exactly. great show as always, my friend. great to see, you enjoy the rest of your evening off. and thanks to ...

barely any time left in the term. looming decisions on trump's immunity claims, gun rights and a host of other issues. plus, a birthday reunion. the gop embraing trump in his first visit to capitol hill since the january 6th riot, but will his comments from yesterday come back to bite him? and later, a chance for peace or a nonstarter, president putin outlining his conditions for peace talks with ukraine. is it a genuine offer? it is 10:00 eastern, and i'm ana cabrera reporting from new york. we begin at the supreme court where in just moments we will get at least one more deci...

Under represented, that has been discriminated against because it means that regardless of these anti-discrimination protections which exist primarily on the state level, there's not necessarily broad protections for sexual orientation on the federal level, all of these state level laws are now in question because simply individuals can say this violates my right to free speech, it's a compelled message that the state is making me adopt, and the court has essentially blessed that. >> mark, these justices weather again going through the confirmation process talked about how there are precedents...

That's basically antidiscrimination laws the state making you adopt and anti-discrimination message. so that should be chilling to anyone in the united states who's from a group that historically has been disenfranchised, that has been under represented, that has been discriminated against because it means that regardless of these anti-discrimination protections which exist primarily on the state level, there's not necessarily broad protections for sexual orientation on the federal level, all of these state level laws are now in question because simply individuals can say this violates my righ...