Statute Talks News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Statute talks. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In Statute Talks Today - Breaking & Trending Today
Appear although we obviously don t know all the details yet. it doesn t appear he used threats of the kind you re talking about or any kind but you don t need to tolate this statute talks about corruptly trying to persuade someone. that is very important here. and may be important in other parts of this investigation as well, not just with respect to manafort. this is not something that those of us who are not lawyers will understand as clearly. but harry let me read you the filings, d 1 has told the government that he underds the efforts to s perry. persond 2 understood that nafort and person a were reaching out to him and d 1 to influence the testimony of potential witnesses. help me understand why this would happen. paul manafort has to know at this point that everybody is watching his every move. ....
Just reckless endangerment more than invasion of privacy because he s the one that broadcast it. reporter: when you transmit that makes it a third degree felony which ups the charges a little bit more. on the criminal side that s it as far as criminal tkharpblgs. charges. i don t think either one of them have a record. you could raise a real issue as to whether or not you could sentence them to the max given what happened here. i would think some 0 smart defense lawyer would say wait a minute. an invasion dash tkaurb can t sentence somebody basically for manslaughter and try to give as much time as humanly months because you couldn t get them on the manslaughter charge. megyn: can robby get out of the charges by saying it s my room, it s my web camera, i m allowed to put it on. reporter: no he can t. the statute talks about some of the instances. the fact is it was a private act in a private room, and mr. clemente had every reasonable expectation of privacy in his dorm room. i ....
First of all, obstruction of justice, witness tampering, can be based on retaliation. it s explicit in the statute. i don t want to get too far into the weeds, but i just think it s important for people to know that given the language that trump used when he admitted why he was revoking the security clearance and why he s threatening to revoke it as to other people who have been and could potentially be witnesses. he s talking about it in very retaliatory terms. and so while we traditionally think of witness tampering as someone threatening or trying to stop someone from speaking, that can be done through retaliation, and the statute talks about it. we also should remember that it isn t just about the fbi investigation. as you said in the setup here to the show, it s about the congressional testimony, congressional hearings, the statutes all explicitly look at that. so he s really, i think, just given a lot more fodder to the idea that many of the things he s been doing when you take ....
Threats of the kind you re talking about or any kind but you don t need to to violate this statute. this statute talks about corruptly trying to persuade someone. that is very important here. and may be important in other parts of this investigation as well, not just with respect to manafort. this is not something that those of us who are not lawyers will understand as clearly. but harry let me read you the filings, d 1 has told the government that he ubnderstands the efforts to support perjury. persond 2 understood that manafort and person a were reaching out to him and d 1 to influence the testimony of potential witnesses. help me understand why this would happen. paul manafort has to know at this point that everybody is watching his every move. what could he or person a ....