state legislatures made the decision. we have moved toward the system of one person, one vote. in the face of that system, state legislatures are trying out a new theory saying it doesn t matter what our people say. we can disregard the vote of people and name our own electors. i ve written some articles about why that s a mistake. i don t think a conservative supreme court would uphold it. i don t agree that supreme court would automatically bow out of the system. that s what they are trying. they are trying to have it both ways. this time they thought that the way to get their way was to advance the theory saying the vice president of the united states has ultimate power to decide who the next president will be. that s crazy. it s not what the system says
well as state law. you get there sort of transmission from the votes go in and the president comes out over here. right on the front lines of trying to reduce the vulnerability and it s important to do that. even if voting rights are fully protected and people get to vote and their votes are not audited out of existence, we still have a lot of plumbing to go through and after people vote, there are a will the of processes by which those who really have no respect for law or for the constitution can turn the system inside out and upside down. that s why people like me are quite vigilant about making sure
communist style social credit system. these demands are so obviously irrational, that forcing you to accept them without complaint, is the whole points of the exercise. it s a form of sadomasochism. it s dominance and submission. it s about power, if they can make you take medicine you don t want, or need. they have one. you are theirs. you belong to them. say don t masochism, spicy. who would willingly suffer in such submission. it s why fox news s been celebrating the very brave resist years and other organizations, who have resigned from their jobs, oregon fired are placed on some kind of weave rather than get the vaccine. or be owned. nurses in teachers, they even brought in an army lieutenant colonel. but their newest champion, is someone at another cable channel, espn. a host their name siege, steele who is now suspended from being on, air partly for appearing on a podcast, and going after her
and partisan lawyers backed by dark money groups. when you think of the? if he s concerned about dark money, he should support the freedom to vote act. and if he s concerned about federal takeover of elections, he needs to read the bill, with the bill provides for is a unified system of minimum standards. so that regardless of where you live in the united states, your freedom to vote is protected. it does not take away from any state the right to control the election, the kind of a collections, but it requires that in that conduct, that you actually conduct yourself honorably, that you treat every voter equally, and that you provide access to the right to vote for andrea every eligible voter. this is indeed, what iowa likes to say it stands for. which is being first in the nation, it what we are saying is whether your first or last. when you go to, vote you should be able to vote with the same quality of democracy that everyone else expects. and that is the freedom to vote act in t
campaigns i ve seen. media matters found that channel push claims undermining vaccines 99% of the days in the past six months and the hosts over there are strenuously opposed to vaccine mandates and requirements. they let you know every chance you get. joe, you cancelled all medical freedom today with your broad mandates. that s where the rubber hits the road. this is tyranny and it s getting more and more aggressive. it s the beginning of the communist style social credit system. these demands are so obviously ir rational that forcing you to accept them without complaint is the whole point of the exercise. it s a form of sado masochism. it s dominance and submission. if you can make you take medicine you don t want orneed, they have won. you belong to them.