Page 6 - Superior Position News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Bring this up to a vote in the the house and again they rejected the million dollars. and now it is a $250,000 threshold. does he bring it up to the house where democrats would have to provide the votes to put him over the top and do this the same week that his -- he is going to have to face selection of speaker? -- election as speaker? >> the first thing to say that the big plan that the president and speaker boehner were close on would pass the house but speaker boehner won't bring it up. and, of course, if he put this plan, the senate plan, the temporary patch as i call it. >> chris: i'm no...

Bring this up to a vote in the the house and again they rejected the million dollars. and now it is a $250,000 threshold. does he bring it up to the house where democrats would have to provide the votes to put him over the top and do this the same week that his -- he is going to have to face selection of speaker? -- election as speaker? >> the first thing to say that the big plan that the president and speaker boehner were close on would pass the house but speaker boehner won't bring it up. and, of course, if he put this plan, the senate plan, the temporary patch as i call it. >> chris: i'm no...

There's no way donald trump would have had him in that position for that long. we saw him how easily he disbars people that disobey him. there's no reason he would stay in that supreme superior position high up that food chain with direct access to donald trump if he weren't doing his bidding. to me, this is what it shows is he was there explicitly to carry out the donald trump orders so donald trump didn't have to do it. >> it's a good point. i can recall, tim o'brien, on my "am joy daze" days. you said allen weisselberg will be the one they focus on because he keeps the numbers. from your po...

Out. those people have been allowed into the country. but the standing that is the sort of injury and the right to be heard in court was built largely around those individuals because what the court said is we're not entirely sure that you exempted them in a binding way because you used the white house council. and we're not sure he has the authority to really do that or that it would remain an exemption. so we're going to treat them like they're still in the mix here and that gives the challengers a superior position. >> let me get you to weigh in on this, michael. there is a line in "the new...