Page 15 - Sworn Statement News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Fri, 22 Jan 2021 08:18 UTC After a court challenge questioning the scientific support behind the claim that "vaccines do not cause autism," the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has removed that headline from its website. The blockbuster change was made quietly last August, and went largely unnoticed, with no public announcement. The CDC Vaccine-Autism page goes on to state in many different ways that parents should not be concerned about vaccines and autism, and "there is no link," while at the same time acknowledging a link cannot be ruled out. In a Question and Answer post, CDC says "more ...

Findings in there, detail all of that. it is indictment of the things that adam schiff was saying. it was indictment of jim comey's leadership at the fbi. >> the canner page, outside advisor to trump campaign, also periodically talking to russians, including sketchy russians. so the fbi wants to get a wiretap on him. fbi send as email to the fbi. is this guy a source for you? the fbi e-mails back, say, yes he is a source. the fbi assistant general counsel, takes email, alterses it, cia said yes he is a source. the fbi lawyer types in, no, he is not a source. maria: unbelievable. >> 180 degrees...

Investigation that he left open to the fbi. >> is somebody who just doesn't have enough information like you said in one of the independent peer to think it might put some people ideas even though i don't think it will matter either way. ben: one thing people or neglect in the fbi investigation has less power than a senate judiciary committee does. they cannot subpoena documents and all the people who have given sworn statement which they are risking penalty of perjury now cannot legally change their opinions or they will be under penalty of perjury from their earlier statement. i don't see a ...

Investigation that he left open to the fbi. >> is somebody who just doesn't have enough information like you said in one of the independent peer to think it might put some people ideas even though i don't think it will matter either way. ben: one thing people or neglect in the fbi investigation has less power than a senate judiciary committee does. they cannot subpoena documents and all the people who have given sworn statement which they are risking penalty of perjury now cannot legally change their opinions or they will be under penalty of perjury from their earlier statement. i don't see a ...

Investigated. but beyond that, based on her sworn statement, based on the presentation you have seen from her attorney michael avenue gnatty, do you believe her allegations? >> do i believe her allegations? you know, what we need is -- i keep coming back to it because we need an fbi investigation because i look at dr. ford's account, and i see the indicators of credibility. meanwhile, all i get from judge brett kavanaugh is i didn't do it. he denies everything or he doesn't remember. what is that? you know, we're faced with them coming forward. and this is a job interview for judge brett kavan...