Page 23 - T Pay News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Votes, there will be a huge huge battle in the u.s. senate. thanks very much. so what do you think the $8 billion they included in this new amendment to pay for preexisting conditions over five years, nancy pelosi says that is certainly not enough. >> no. look, at the end of the day it is $8 billion for the high risk pools. one of the main reasons why the proponent of the obamacare wanted this ban is because the high risk pools that existed before obamacare were kind of a joke. because they were never funded properly and people got insurance. but they couldn't pay for it. that why people like ...

Into further debt. we cannot have further deficits. the president said we have another way. we have another way, mexico will pay for it. when they said they won't pay for it and mexico won't pay for it, no other alternative came along. >> everything this week, tax renorm. he wants to lowter corporate tax rate down to 15%. that's lower than paul ryan's plan and the trump administration said economic growth is going to pay for, this house republicans that ran on cutting the deficit and cutting the debt say hold on a second. we're not talking about running up deficits by cutting taxes. we want of...

Problems, which is to say if they can't pass healthcare, how are they going to pass tax reform or infrastructure or anything? i don't think there's a reason that democrats now would work with them. they have no incentive. in fact, i think their incentives are perverse. they should be obstructionisobs. they will do to republicans what republicans did to them. this could be ugly. we are looking at a possible government shutdown coming up. man who would have thunk it it would end up this way. >> you raise a bunch of issues. we want to get to the democrats and the government shutdown possibility. ...

Million that he was able to carry forward from the mid '90s, into his tax returns into the easterly naught, including the 2005 return, and the reason he was able to take advantage of that loophole wasn't simply because he was a smart businessman taking advantage of the tax code, was also because he'd been a horrible business person in most of his real estate dealings in the '80s and early '90s, and those losses were reflective of the massive loans that he couldn't pay back and the business losses he suffered because of his bad judgment. >> there had been reporting, tim, and you would probably ...

Million that he was able to carry forward from the mid '90s, into his tax returns into the early of, including the 2005 return, and the reason he was able to take advantage of that loophole wasn't simply because he was a smart businessman taking advantage of the tax code, was also because he'd been a horrible business person in most of his real estate dealings in the '80s and early '90s, and those losses were reflective of the massive loans that he couldn't pay back and the business losses he suffered because of his bad judgment. >> there had been reporting, tim, and you would probably be more...